Comparison Overview

Breast Cancer Alliance

VS

Macon Volunteer Clinic

Breast Cancer Alliance

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The mission of Breast Cancer Alliance is to improve survival rates and quality of life for those impacted by breast cancer through better prevention, early detection, treatment and cure. To promote these goals, we invest in innovative research, breast surgery fellowships, regional education, dignified support and screening for the uninsured and underserved.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Macon Volunteer Clinic

376 Rogers Avenue, Macon, GA, 31204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Macon Volunteer Clinic provides free primary medical, dental, and eye care, as well as medication assistance, to working, uninsured adult residents of Bibb and Twiggs Counties. Services include, but are not limited to, primary medical care; dental exams, cleanings, restorative services, and extractions: eye exams and prescription eyeglasses; laboratory analyses; diagnostic services; dermatological services; non-narcotic prescription medication assistance; cancer screenings such as mammograms, Pap smears, and colonoscopies; dietary counseling; mental health counseling; and outpatient surgeries. Thanks to a generous network of caring volunteers and donors in the community, MVC patients receive all services at no cost to them.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/breast-cancer-alliance.jpeg
Breast Cancer Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macon-volunteer-clinic.jpeg
Macon Volunteer Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Breast Cancer Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Macon Volunteer Clinic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Breast Cancer Alliance in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macon Volunteer Clinic in 2025.

Incident History — Breast Cancer Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Breast Cancer Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Macon Volunteer Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macon Volunteer Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/breast-cancer-alliance.jpeg
Breast Cancer Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macon-volunteer-clinic.jpeg
Macon Volunteer Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Macon Volunteer Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Breast Cancer Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Macon Volunteer Clinic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Breast Cancer Alliance company.

In the current year, Macon Volunteer Clinic company and Breast Cancer Alliance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Macon Volunteer Clinic company nor Breast Cancer Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Macon Volunteer Clinic company nor Breast Cancer Alliance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Macon Volunteer Clinic company nor Breast Cancer Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance company nor Macon Volunteer Clinic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance company nor Macon Volunteer Clinic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Macon Volunteer Clinic company employs more people globally than Breast Cancer Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Breast Cancer Alliance nor Macon Volunteer Clinic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H