Comparison Overview

Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc.

VS

Options for Community Living, Inc.

Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc.

702 Marshall St., Suite 340, Redwood City, 94036, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

WHO WE ARE We're behavioral health and technology industry leaders who are passionate about bringing quality mental health care to those who need it. We believe that improving access to behavioral health care has fundamental importance for enhancing the quality of lives for millions of Americans. Breakthrough is transforming how people receive care by integrating quality services with state-of-the-art technology. OUR VISION We strive to provide a convenient, easy-to-use, quality, and secure solution for those in need of mental health care. OUR PROVIDERS We custom build our network to meet the requirements of our customers. Patients can browse through the list of providers and watch introduction videos to find a great match. We also offer personalized one-to-one training to help providers develop an effective online presence, and our outcome-informed model gives us valuable data to manage the quality of our network.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Options for Community Living, Inc.

25 Howard Place, Ronkonkoma, New York, 11779, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Options for Community Living, Inc. is a community based not-for-profit organization established in 1982 to serve Long Islanders in need. Through housing programs and case management services, we prepare participants for the demands of community life; promote housing permanency; and foster individual health, safety, and welfare. Our programs are specialized to serve individuals with psychiatric disabilities and other serious chronic illnesses including HIV/AIDS. Options served more than 2,000 adults and children on Long Island last year.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/breakthrough_2.jpeg
Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/options-for-community-living-inc..jpeg
Options for Community Living, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Options for Community Living, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Options for Community Living, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Options for Community Living, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Options for Community Living, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/breakthrough_2.jpeg
Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/options-for-community-living-inc..jpeg
Options for Community Living, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Options for Community Living, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Options for Community Living, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company.

In the current year, Options for Community Living, Inc. company and Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Options for Community Living, Inc. company nor Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Options for Community Living, Inc. company nor Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Options for Community Living, Inc. company nor Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company nor Options for Community Living, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company nor Options for Community Living, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Options for Community Living, Inc. company employs more people globally than Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Breakthrough Behavioral, Inc. nor Options for Community Living, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N