Comparison Overview

Brazino777 Brasil

VS

Vivo Gaming

Brazino777 Brasil

None
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Brazino777.bet.br é o cassino online da galera – feito para o povo, amado pelos brasileiros, com uma experiência digital completa e cheia de emoção. Aqui você encontra um universo de entretenimento com apostas esportivas, cassino ao vivo e milhares de jogos de cassino online, tudo com tecnologia avançada, pagamentos ágeis, segurança reforçada e suporte 24/7. Operamos no Brasil como cassino online licenciado no País, autorizado pela Portaria SPA/MF nº 466/2025. Isso garante conformidade com padrões rigorosos de segurança, transparência e jogo responsável, oferecendo um ambiente regulado e confiável para você curtir suas apostas e jogos com tranquilidade. 18+ | Jogue com Responsabilidade.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vivo Gaming

House of Francis, room 303, Ile Du Port, Mahe, Seychelles, Mahe, SC
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Vivo Gaming is an innovative company specializing in bringing emerging technologies into the online gaming industry with 15+ years of live dealer and B2B experience. We are a software supplier that offers a proprietary live dealer games platform streaming 24/7 from multiple studios worldwide Bulgaria, Philippines, Georgia, Uruguay, and Colombia, as well RNG and Sports platforms from the best suppliers in the world. Vivo Gaming provides top-notch gaming solutions for operators, entrepreneurs, and land-based casino owners.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brazino777brasil.jpeg
Brazino777 Brasil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivogaming.jpeg
Vivo Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brazino777 Brasil
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vivo Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brazino777 Brasil in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — Brazino777 Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brazino777 Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vivo Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vivo Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brazino777brasil.jpeg
Brazino777 Brasil
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivogaming.jpeg
Vivo Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Vivo Gaming company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brazino777 Brasil company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vivo Gaming company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brazino777 Brasil company.

In the current year, Vivo Gaming company and Brazino777 Brasil company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vivo Gaming company nor Brazino777 Brasil company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vivo Gaming company nor Brazino777 Brasil company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vivo Gaming company nor Brazino777 Brasil company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil company nor Vivo Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vivo Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Brazino777 Brasil company.

Vivo Gaming company employs more people globally than Brazino777 Brasil company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brazino777 Brasil nor Vivo Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N