Comparison Overview

BraunWeiss

VS

Tata Elxsi

BraunWeiss

75 2nd Ave, Needham Heights, Massachusetts, 02494, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

BraunWeiss Inc is Managed Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) services providers helping organizations assess, monitor, and mitigate risks associated with their third-party vendors and service providers. BraunWeiss, is your trusted partner in third-party assessment services. As a valued member of Shared Assessments, we specialize in providing comprehensive assessment solutions tailored to meet the unique needs of businesses across various industries. Our mission is to facilitate informed decision-making by delivering accurate, unbiased evaluations that drive excellence and foster trust between stakeholders. We provide third party risk management (TPRM) consulting and advisory services in vendor management lifecyle, peforming vendor assessments, from vendor sorucing and RFx processes, contracting and onboarding, assessing and remediating risk, continious monitoring and validation to offboarding. BraunWeiss stands as a premier provider of comprehensive TPRM solutions and services tailored to meet the unique needs of your organization. We provide governance framework, run the your risk operations, navigating regulatory compliance, safeguarding sensitive data, fortifying risk resilience against emerging threats, our suite of services is designed to empower every step in the vendor risk management cycle. Our team of seasoned professionals brings a wealth of experience across diverse sectors, from risk assessment and vendor due diligence to ongoing monitoring and remediation. At BraunWeiss, we recognize and take a consultative approach, working closely with you to understand specific vendor risk landscape, goals, and constraints. Whether you're a multinational corporation, SMB or a disruptive startup, our services align seamlessly with organizational objectives.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tata Elxsi

ITBP Road Whitefield Bangalore, Karnataka 560 048, IN
Last Update: 2025-04-24 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Tata Elxsi is amongst the worldโ€™s leading providers of design and technology services across industries, including Automotive, Broadcast, Communications, and Healthcare. Tata Elxsi is helping customers reimagine their products and services through design thinking and the application of digital technologies such as IoT (Internet of Things), Cloud, Mobility, Virtual Reality, and Artificial Intelligence. Tata Elxsi is truly home to a billion possibilities. We believe in opportunities for everyone - to be bold, and curious and seek to shape the future. Explore whatโ€™s possible, discover what you love to do, and find accelerated paths for growth. At Tata Elxsi, you matter.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/braunweiss-inc.jpeg
BraunWeiss
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
BraunWeiss
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Elxsi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BraunWeiss in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi in 2025.

Incident History โ€” BraunWeiss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BraunWeiss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Tata Elxsi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Elxsi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/braunweiss-inc.jpeg
BraunWeiss
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unknown (general cyberattacks), Data exfiltration (Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters), Supply chain (Salesforce/Salesloft)
Motivation: Financial gain (ransomware), Espionage, Disruption (DDoS), Data theft (leaks)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BraunWeiss company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Tata Elxsi company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Elxsi company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BraunWeiss company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Elxsi company has reported more cyber incidents than BraunWeiss company.

Tata Elxsi company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while BraunWeiss company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BraunWeiss company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BraunWeiss company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BraunWeiss company nor Tata Elxsi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BraunWeiss company.

BraunWeiss company employs more people globally than Tata Elxsi company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N