Comparison Overview

Brandywine Urology

VS

LA Fitness

Brandywine Urology

2000 Foulk Rd, Suite F, Wilmington, Delaware, US, 19810
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Brandywine Urology Consultants is a health, wellness and fitness company based out of Delaware.

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

LA Fitness

PO Box 55088, Irvine, California, 92619, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

LA Fitness is a privately owned fitness club chain. LA Fitness has hundreds of health clubs gyms and millions of members across US and Canada. In an industry often equated with fad and fashion, LA Fitness has steadily increased its presence by focusing on the one lifelong benefit valued by everyone: good health. Established in Southern California in 1984, LA Fitness continues to seek innovative ways to enhance the wellbeing of its members. Today, LA Fitness’ state-of-the-art clubs span the continent and continue to expand. LA Fitness’ strong and successful growth stems from its commitment to understanding and meeting the distinct needs of each community it serves. With a wide range of amenities and a highly trained staff, LA Fitness can provide fun and effective workout options to family members of all ages and interests. Website - http://www.lafitness.com Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/LAFitness Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/LAFitness Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+lafitness YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/lafitness

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 14,288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandywine-urology-consultants.jpeg
Brandywine Urology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brandywine Urology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LA Fitness
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandywine Urology in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LA Fitness in 2025.

Incident History — Brandywine Urology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandywine Urology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LA Fitness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LA Fitness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandywine-urology-consultants.jpeg
Brandywine Urology
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LA Fitness company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brandywine Urology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Brandywine Urology company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LA Fitness company has not reported any.

In the current year, LA Fitness company and Brandywine Urology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Brandywine Urology company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while LA Fitness company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Brandywine Urology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Brandywine Urology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brandywine Urology company nor LA Fitness company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brandywine Urology company nor LA Fitness company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LA Fitness company employs more people globally than Brandywine Urology company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brandywine Urology nor LA Fitness holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N