Comparison Overview

Brandslandia Group

VS

Senior.com

Brandslandia Group

Bucharest, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-30
Between 750 and 799

Vision: Mindfully building a profitable and scalable eCommerce business focused on operating great brands with superb customer experience while growing sustainability in Eastern European region. Market Focus: Focusing on the biggest and fastest Growing Eastern European Markets - Poland, Romania, Czech Republic, Hungary and Bulgaria, a combined Market of +50M internet users and a forecasted €50B GMV by 2028. Business Models: Bringing Western European ecommerce Brands to the Eastern European Consumers via the leading regional Marketplaces – eMAG and Allegro. Operating ourselves with an experienced team of ex-Marketplace Rockstars. Supporting Companies for Liquidating inventories over multiple channels. Incubating own brands, sourcing them locally, optimizing them on the regional markets and scaling them over the leading Marketplaces on the Western European Markets. Opportunistically acquiring Brands, optimizing and scaling them across multiple territories.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Senior.com

15791 Rockfield Blvd, Irvine, California, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

Senior.com is the #1 Online resource for Seniors & Caregivers because of 1 thing.......WE CARE! One of our specialties is helping people stay in their homes longer. With the right equipment installed in a home, we can prevent falls. Fall prevention is the #1 way to make sure you don’t slide into a new stage of care that might require assisted living, costing 10's of thousands of dollars. Our Customer Care Specialists can educate you about improving different hot spots in your home so you can maintain your independence for as long as possible. Today, Senior.com has 2.7 million members and we are rapidly growing every day. We offer over 500 top brands and sell over 150,000 products throughout the United States. We have earned our reputation by providing quality content, personalized customer service and being a trusted supplier.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 382
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandslandia-group.jpeg
Brandslandia Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior.com.jpeg
Senior.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brandslandia Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Senior.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandslandia Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senior.com in 2025.

Incident History — Brandslandia Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandslandia Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Senior.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senior.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandslandia-group.jpeg
Brandslandia Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior.com.jpeg
Senior.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Senior.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brandslandia Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Senior.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brandslandia Group company.

In the current year, Senior.com company and Brandslandia Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Senior.com company nor Brandslandia Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Senior.com company nor Brandslandia Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Senior.com company nor Brandslandia Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brandslandia Group company nor Senior.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Senior.com company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Brandslandia Group company.

Senior.com company employs more people globally than Brandslandia Group company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brandslandia Group nor Senior.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X