Comparison Overview

Brandmark, Inc

VS

FABER FRANCE by Specimade

Brandmark, Inc

506 Fair St, Anderson, South Carolina, US, 29625
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Brandmark, a Wise company, is a label and tag manufacturer providing the best solutions to your label and tag challenges. We will utilize our extensive portfolio of raw materials and manufacturing capabilities to create products the exceed expectations. Brandmark strives to be your leading partner by providing superior products with exceptional customer service. Our team is standing by to help you find the right solution for your application.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FABER FRANCE by Specimade

Route de la Centrale, ZI des Ansereuilles, WAVRIN, FR, 59136
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Depuis 1989 FABER FRANCE fabrique des solutions visuelles personnalisables de PLV, Signalétique et Supports événementiels pour permettre à nos clients d’afficher leur singularité en créant et en optimisant leur visibilité. Grâce à nos ateliers de fabrication internalisés et nos outils industriels ultra-performants nous maitrisons la chaine de valeur de A à Z : de la conception à l’installation. Notre mission : Faciliter la vie de nos clients dans tous leurs projets d’impact visuel ! FABER France est une marque du Groupe SPECIMADE. Pour en savoir + : www.specimade.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandmark-inc-.jpeg
Brandmark, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/faber-france.jpeg
FABER FRANCE by Specimade
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brandmark, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FABER FRANCE by Specimade
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandmark, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FABER FRANCE by Specimade in 2025.

Incident History — Brandmark, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandmark, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FABER FRANCE by Specimade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FABER FRANCE by Specimade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandmark-inc-.jpeg
Brandmark, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/faber-france.jpeg
FABER FRANCE by Specimade
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brandmark, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FABER FRANCE by Specimade company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FABER FRANCE by Specimade company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brandmark, Inc company.

In the current year, FABER FRANCE by Specimade company and Brandmark, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FABER FRANCE by Specimade company nor Brandmark, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FABER FRANCE by Specimade company nor Brandmark, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FABER FRANCE by Specimade company nor Brandmark, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brandmark, Inc company nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brandmark, Inc company nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FABER FRANCE by Specimade company employs more people globally than Brandmark, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brandmark, Inc nor FABER FRANCE by Specimade holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N