Comparison Overview

Branded Editions

VS

Baptist Standard Publishing

Branded Editions

Vancouver, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Branded Editions’ reader-first features help your audience embrace technology while matching your premium content with an unparalleled reading experience -- via the web, iOS, Android and Amazon platforms. Built with PressReader’s proprietary technology, our white-label digital publishing solution powers leading publications across the globe, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Times (of London), El País, Clarín. Branded Editions helps increase touchpoints, discover new audiences, drive revenue, and grow brand loyalty. Help your readers embrace what’s next with our award-winning platform.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Baptist Standard Publishing

5151 Headquarters Dr, Plano, 75024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Baptist Standard Publishing is an independent, nonprofit media organization that provides content and resources focused on Baptists and global Christians, as well as the cultural contexts in which they live out their faith. Our mission is to inform, inspire and challenge people to live like Jesus. The Baptist Standard is the independent forum for Baptist voices speaking to the challenges of today’s world. We attract, support and collaborate with forward-looking people committed to historic Baptist ideals and the spectrum of Baptist voices.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/branded-editions.jpeg
Branded Editions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baptist-standard-publishing.jpeg
Baptist Standard Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Branded Editions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baptist Standard Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Branded Editions in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baptist Standard Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Branded Editions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Branded Editions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baptist Standard Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baptist Standard Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/branded-editions.jpeg
Branded Editions
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baptist-standard-publishing.jpeg
Baptist Standard Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Branded Editions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Baptist Standard Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Branded Editions company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baptist Standard Publishing company has not reported any.

In the current year, Baptist Standard Publishing company and Branded Editions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing company nor Branded Editions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baptist Standard Publishing company nor Branded Editions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Branded Editions company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Baptist Standard Publishing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Branded Editions company nor Baptist Standard Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Branded Editions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Baptist Standard Publishing company.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Branded Editions nor Baptist Standard Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.