Comparison Overview

Brainerd Industries, Inc.

VS

Command Financial

Brainerd Industries, Inc.

680 Precision Ct, Miamisburg, OH, 45342, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Manufacturers of cosmetic trim parts for OEMs in the consumer electronics, appliance, television, computer & automotive industries. Meets a variety of application needs in the stamping, blanking, die cutting, printing & powder coating of metal & plastic. Products include screen printed decorative metal & plastic trim for graphic overlays, panels, dials, escutcheons and nameplates. Also, produces custom powder coated metal speaker grilles in perforated & expanded metal for audio, automotive, television & computer applications.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Command Financial

125 Broad St, None, New York, NY, US, 10004
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Command Financial, one of the country’s largest financial printers, offers the latest in fully integrated, technology-based solutions and personalized service related to data, document, and distribution elements of document lifecycle management. We continue to redefine financial printing by providing a full range of financial printing services including state-of-the-art typesetting, highly experienced customer service, in-house proofreading, EDGAR, XBRL, language translation, and extensive in-house press capacity. Our press and production capacity—one of the largest in the country—includes digital print, print-on-demand, web, and sheet-fed capabilities; and perfect binding; as well as traditional and electronic fulfillment. We also offer industry leading content management through our Command Automated Publishing System, CAPS. The prospectus and shareholder report modules of CAPS are content management and automated document assembly tools that utilize an intuitive user interface and a database driven virtual library, allowing clients to manage and repurpose information. Our Integration module bridges the capabilities of our prospectus and shareholder report modules to provide a comprehensive solution for content and management. Command is ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, reflecting industry-leading focus on information management security and quality assurance. Further, we have in place a robust and fully tested Business Continuity Disaster Recovery Plan.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brainerd-industries-inc-.jpeg
Brainerd Industries, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/command-financial-press.jpeg
Command Financial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brainerd Industries, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Command Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brainerd Industries, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Command Financial in 2025.

Incident History — Brainerd Industries, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brainerd Industries, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Command Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Command Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brainerd-industries-inc-.jpeg
Brainerd Industries, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/command-financial-press.jpeg
Command Financial
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Command Financial company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brainerd Industries, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Command Financial company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brainerd Industries, Inc. company.

In the current year, Command Financial company and Brainerd Industries, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Command Financial company nor Brainerd Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Command Financial company nor Brainerd Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Command Financial company nor Brainerd Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. company nor Command Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. company nor Command Financial company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Command Financial company employs more people globally than Brainerd Industries, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brainerd Industries, Inc. nor Command Financial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L