Comparison Overview

Brain in Hand

VS

DECLIC

Brain in Hand

Broadwalk House, Exeter, EX1 1TS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Want to support your ADHD and autistic team but don’t know where to start? Struggling to understand what practical changes would actually make a difference for neurodivergent staff? Overwhelmed by all the advice on neurodiversity, but need simple, actionable steps? Worried about making mistakes or saying the wrong thing when trying to be supportive? We’re here to help. In a world increasingly recognising neurodivergent perspectives, Brain in Hand is your expert neurodiversity partner. We take coaching beyond scheduled sessions into everyday moments, delivering personalised support and real human guidance on-demand 24/7 – exactly when it’s needed most. For organisations, it means you can offer all the actionable support that neurodivergent people need. For individuals, we build confidence and independence through practical tools. We work with each person on strategies that play to their unique strengths, helping them manage anxiety, overwhelm, and stay organised – all on their own terms. With over half our team being neurodivergent, we don’t just understand the journey, we’re on it with you. We actively partner with neurodivergent users in developing and refining our platform – ensuring it addresses real needs with practical solutions. Approved by the DfE and NHS, and partnering with workplaces, universities, and health and social care, we’ve already empowered over 25,000 people, and we’re ready to help your team, too. “Without Brain in Hand, I wouldn’t be able to cope. I would be panicking more often and be more indecisive every day. I’d be less organised, unable to monitor what I’m actually feeling. That to me has been invaluable – acknowledging how I’m feeling helps me then use the right solutions for the situation.”

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DECLIC

2721 Everett, Montréal, Québec, H2A1R8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Déclic est un réseau de clinique en développement de l'enfant. mettant à la disposition des parents et des milieux éducatifs, une équipe de professionnels interdisciplinaire. Depuis ses débuts, Déclic offre le service mobile, donnant accès aux milieux de garde et aux écoles à des professionnels d'aide à l'enfance. Notre équipe allie ses forces à celles de votre milieu pour le développement du plein potentiel des enfants à besoins particuliers. La motivation première du personnel de Déclic? L’intégration des enfants à défis particuliers dans leur milieu de vie. Pour les familles, nos cliniques vous reçoivent sur rendez-vous dans une atmosphère chaleureuse et moderne et vous donnent accès à une équipe de professionnelles qui y travaillent en collaboration. Tout sous le même toit!

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brain-in-hand.jpeg
Brain in Hand
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/declic.jpeg
DECLIC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brain in Hand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DECLIC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brain in Hand in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DECLIC in 2026.

Incident History — Brain in Hand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brain in Hand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DECLIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DECLIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brain-in-hand.jpeg
Brain in Hand
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/declic.jpeg
DECLIC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Brain in Hand company and DECLIC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, DECLIC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brain in Hand company.

In the current year, DECLIC company and Brain in Hand company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DECLIC company nor Brain in Hand company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DECLIC company nor Brain in Hand company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DECLIC company nor Brain in Hand company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brain in Hand company nor DECLIC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brain in Hand company nor DECLIC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brain in Hand company employs more people globally than DECLIC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brain in Hand nor DECLIC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N