Comparison Overview

Bradford Tax Institute

VS

Charleston Law Review

Bradford Tax Institute

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bradfordtaxinstitute.com

The Tax Reduction Letter helps small businesses (including one-owner and spouse-owned proprietorships, S corporations, C corporations, and LLCs) save thousands of dollars on their taxes every year. It’s written in plain English for the small business owner but fully annotated for the tax professional. Every month, we delve into the latest legislative changes, court cases, and IRS news to deliver the most up-to-the-minute tax saving strategies – all 100% legal and supported by applicable law. The Tax Reduction Letter is published by the Bradford Tax Institute, which was founded by W. Murray Bradford in 1991. Bradford is the nation’s pre-eminent tax reduction expert, having found an average of $17,700 in new tax deductions for over 500,000 (and counting!) small businesses and self-employed professionals.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Charleston Law Review

81 Mary St, None, Charleston, South Carolina, US, 29403
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
https://charlestonlaw.edu/charleston-law-review/

The Charleston Law Review is an independent organization composed entirely of upper-level students at the Charleston School of Law. In order to gain membership on the Charleston Law Review, first year students must compete in a writing competition that begins after spring semester finals have concluded. The Charleston Law Review then makes membership offers to students based on a combination of grades and the scored writing piece. The Charleston Law Review recruits the best and brightest students from the Charleston School of Law. The Law Review’s primary objective is to foster the knowledge and insight of students, practitioners, scholars, and the judiciary through a traditional forum dedicated to augmenting the pursuit of innovative legal expression, composition, and scholarship. Members of the Law Review contribute to this objective by editing articles, writing notes, and actively participating all aspects of the publication process.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradford-tax-institute.jpeg
Bradford Tax Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-law-review.jpeg
Charleston Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bradford Tax Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charleston Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bradford Tax Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Bradford Tax Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bradford Tax Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charleston Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bradford-tax-institute.jpeg
Bradford Tax Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-law-review.jpeg
Charleston Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Charleston Law Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bradford Tax Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charleston Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bradford Tax Institute company.

In the current year, Charleston Law Review company and Bradford Tax Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charleston Law Review company nor Bradford Tax Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charleston Law Review company nor Bradford Tax Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charleston Law Review company nor Bradford Tax Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute company nor Charleston Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute company nor Charleston Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charleston Law Review company employs more people globally than Bradford Tax Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bradford Tax Institute nor Charleston Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References