Comparison Overview

Brad James Photography

VS

Lost San Jose

Brad James Photography

Johnston Street, Annandale, NSW, 2038, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Brad James Photography is based in Sydney. Brad works across corporate and retail, events, architecture, family & kids, pets and landscape photography. He is passionate about delivering an amazing experience for his clients and high quality images every time. Please visit bradjamesphotography.com.au to explore Brad's portfolio and landscape photography online store. We'd love to chat to you about your photographic requirements and provide a quote. Please email us at [email protected] or call Brad on 0499 629 309 any time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lost San Jose

San Jose San Jose, CA 95125, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Lost San Jose is the photography of Josh Marcotte. Josh has been documenting his life and the changing landscape of Silicon Valley and beyond for over a decade. His photos focus on views of everyday life in Silicon Valley, as well the people he meets, and the buildings, structures, and items that have become abandoned or overlooked. Josh Marcotte is a self taught photographer and fourth generation resident of San Jose, California. His ongoing project started when he was a college student in 1997 as a series of short stories about his life and exploits in the odd and forgotten corners of Silicon Valley. In 2001, Josh started photographing the places that inspired his writing with disposable cameras. The project has been featured in the San Jose Mercury News, Content Magazine, and various online and in print publications. Josh has a BA in history from San Jose State.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brad-james-photography.jpeg
Brad James Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lost-san-jose.jpeg
Lost San Jose
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brad James Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lost San Jose
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brad James Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lost San Jose in 2025.

Incident History — Brad James Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brad James Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lost San Jose (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lost San Jose cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brad-james-photography.jpeg
Brad James Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lost-san-jose.jpeg
Lost San Jose
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brad James Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lost San Jose company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lost San Jose company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brad James Photography company.

In the current year, Lost San Jose company and Brad James Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lost San Jose company nor Brad James Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lost San Jose company nor Brad James Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lost San Jose company nor Brad James Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brad James Photography company nor Lost San Jose company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brad James Photography company nor Lost San Jose company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Brad James Photography company and Lost San Jose company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brad James Photography nor Lost San Jose holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N