Comparison Overview

bp

VS

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

bp

1 St James Square, London, England, SW1Y 4PD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

Check out our commenting guidelines 👉 bp.com/CommentsGuide

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 72,241
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Avenida. Libertador con calle El Empalme , Complejo MinPetróleo - PDVSA, La Campiña, Caracas, Venezuela, VE, 1050
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. is a Venezuelan state company, began operations on January 1st, 1976 and whose activities are the oil exploration, production, refining, marketing and transportation of Venezuelan oil as well as the orimulsion, chemical, petrochemical businesses and coal. We have the largest oil reserves in the world, reaching at the end of 2013, a total certified sum of 298,353 million barrels, which represent 20% of the world reserves of this resource. Also we manage 197.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in proven reserves, a figure that places us in eighth place worldwide. PDVSA carries out its crude processing operations through 14 refineries: six in Venezuela, and nine in the rest of the world. The national refining system is made up of 6 refineries that have a processing capacity of 1 million 303 MBD of which 52% is destined for the local market and 48% for export. The international refining system is made up of 9 refineries located in the Caribbean region, United States and Europe. Our subsidiaries and affiliates are located across the globe in Venezuela, Belgium, China, Dominican Republic, Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Headquartered in Caracas, Venezuela, with offices and operations throughout the country, we employ more than 140,000 workers worldwide.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 25,485
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bp.jpeg
bp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petroleosdevenezuela.jpeg
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
bp
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for bp in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. in 2025.

Incident History — bp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

bp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bp.jpeg
bp
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petroleosdevenezuela.jpeg
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2002
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: insider threat (possible), remote access
Motivation: political (supporting the general strike), economic sabotage (disrupting oil production)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

bp company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas bp company has not reported any.

In the current year, PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company and bp company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company nor bp company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company nor bp company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while bp company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither bp company nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

bp company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company.

bp company employs more people globally than PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither bp nor PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H