Comparison Overview

Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP

VS

Drendel & Jansons Law Group

Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP

1620 5th Ave, Moline, Illinois, 61265, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP is a full service law firm made up of 13 attorneys and 3 of counsel attorneys. For over 60 years, the firm has served clients in the Illinois and Iowa Quad Cities area and beyond. The firm offers a full range of legal services to its clients, including practice areas in Civil Litigation, Business, Employment, Real Estate, Estate Planning and Administration, and Workers'​ Compensation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Drendel & Jansons Law Group

111 Flinn Street, Batavia, IL, 60510, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Our roots go back to 1961 when Gilbert X. Drendel, Jr. joined the legendary Reid, Ochsenschlager, Murphy & Hupp law firm in Aurora. Gilbert (“Gib”) Drendel and left to form a new firm in 1981. Seven attorneys moved with him from Aurora to Batavia in 1994 and formed Drendel, Tatnall, Hoffman & McCracken. The Drendel & Jansons Law Group continues the same solid tradition, providing the same sterling legal services and advice to communities, businesses, business owners and their families in Kane County and beyond. Professional, but personable, traditional, but cutting edge, we combine the best of past and present.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bozeman-neighbour-patton-&-noe.jpeg
Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drendel-&-jansons-law-group.jpeg
Drendel & Jansons Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Drendel & Jansons Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Drendel & Jansons Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Drendel & Jansons Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drendel & Jansons Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bozeman-neighbour-patton-&-noe.jpeg
Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drendel-&-jansons-law-group.jpeg
Drendel & Jansons Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drendel & Jansons Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Drendel & Jansons Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company.

In the current year, Drendel & Jansons Law Group company and Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Drendel & Jansons Law Group company nor Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Drendel & Jansons Law Group company nor Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Drendel & Jansons Law Group company nor Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP company employs more people globally than Drendel & Jansons Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, LLP nor Drendel & Jansons Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X