Comparison Overview

Boyd Interactive

VS

Acres

Boyd Interactive

2235 Sheppard Ave E, 1500, North York, Ontario, CA, M2J 5B5
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Founded in 2013, Pala Interactive envisioned and anticipated the growth of online gaming in the United States. Today, through our Online Gaming Platform, including best-in-class and proprietary technology services, player account management platforms, online casino products and games, combined with relevant content and technological integrations, Pala Interactive is a leader in online real money and social gaming. Pala Interactive operates in multiple States throughout the U.S.A. and Canada within the B2C and B2B space. Pala Interactive was acquired by Boyd Gaming in November of 2022.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Acres

6415 S Tenaya Way, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89113, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Acres Manufacturing was founded by John Acres, the inventor of casino systems technology. Our history of innovation is what’s creating the future of gaming: systems that enhance profitability with technology that is intuitive, robust, and helpful on an almost human level. That’s more critical now than ever. The casino industry today doesn't readily accept change. And businesses that refuse to evolve die. We make that evolution easy for our clients – and we make it profitable, too. Gaming like you used to know it is gone. So are you going away with it? Don’t die out – move forward with Acres.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boydinteractive.jpeg
Boyd Interactive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acres-4-0.jpeg
Acres
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boyd Interactive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Acres
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boyd Interactive in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acres in 2025.

Incident History — Boyd Interactive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boyd Interactive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Acres (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acres cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boydinteractive.jpeg
Boyd Interactive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acres-4-0.jpeg
Acres
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boyd Interactive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Acres company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Acres company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boyd Interactive company.

In the current year, Acres company and Boyd Interactive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Acres company nor Boyd Interactive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Acres company nor Boyd Interactive company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Acres company nor Boyd Interactive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boyd Interactive company nor Acres company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boyd Interactive company nor Acres company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Boyd Interactive company employs more people globally than Acres company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boyd Interactive nor Acres holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H