Comparison Overview

Boyd Gaming

VS

Novomatic Italia

Boyd Gaming

6465 S Rainbow Blvd, Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 89118
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 0 and 549

Boyd Gaming Corporation is one of the nation’s leading casino entertainment companies, but we’re so much more than that! We're a billion-dollar, publicly-traded company that retains the philosophy of a family-owned business, focused on creating long-term, sustainable growth for our shareholders. This philosophy defines and separates us from the competition, making us unique in our industry. From our beginnings in the 1970s, we made a commitment to our guests, employees, and communities to create a culture and an operating style built around that of a family-owned business. Even as a public company operating in a highly competitive industry, the Boyd Style of hospitality continues to define us. We currently own and operate 28 gaming properties in ten states: Aliante, Cannery, Eastside Cannery, Gold Coast, The Orleans, Sam’s Town, Suncoast, California, Fremont and Main Street Station in Las Vegas; Jokers Wild in Henderson, NV; Blue Chip in Michigan City, IN and Belterra Casino Resort in Florence, IN; Par-A-Dice in East Peoria, IL; Diamond Jo Dubuque in Dubuque, IA and Diamond Jo Casino in Northwood, IA; Belterra Park in Cincinnati, OH; Kansas Star in Mulvane, KS; Ameristar Kansas City in Kansas City, MO and Ameristar St. Charles in St. Charles, MO; Valley Forge in King of Prussia, PA; Sam’s Town in Tunica, MS and IP Biloxi in Biloxi, MS; Amelia Belle in Amelia, LA, Treasure Chest in Kenner, LA, Delta Downs in Vinton, LA, Evangeline Downs in Opelousas, LA, and Sam’s Town in Shreveport, LA. Each is distinguished not only by the quality of its amenities but also by the exceptional customer service our guests have come to expect from a Boyd Gaming property.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 6,766
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Novomatic Italia

Via Benedetto Croce, 122-124, Roma, Roma, Lazio, 00144, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Il Gruppo NOVOMATIC AG è uno dei più grandi produttori al mondo di tecnologie per il gioco legale e impiega oltre 24.500 dipendenti. Il Gruppo è stato fondato dal Professor Johann F. Graf nel 1980 e ha sedi in circa 50 paesi. NOVOMATIC esporta attrezzature di gioco innovative in circa 100 stati e ad oggi gestisce oltre 214.000 terminali di gioco e videolotteries (VLT) in circa 2.100 tra sale giochi, casinò e centri scommesse di proprietà, o tramite noleggio. Approdato in Italia nel 2007, nel 2014 assume la denominazione di NOVOMATIC Italia. Oggi conta un organico di 4.000 unità nel Paese, dalla sede legale di Roma in via Benedetto Croce, al centro di produzione di Rimini in Via Galla Placidia, fino alla sede di Bolzano, Busto Arsizio ed Imola, passando per le decine di sedi dei nostri noleggi e tutti i luoghi dell’offerta commerciale, specializzata nella fornitura di Newslot e Videolottery. Ad oggi l’Italia è uno dei più importanti player sul mercato nostrano e fiore all’occhiello del Gruppo in Europa. Nel corso di questi anni l’offerta si è ampliata diffondendo il marchio ADMIRAL in quasi 300 sale da gioco e sale bingo a gestione diretta, il concessionario degli apparecchi da intrattenimento ADMIRAL Gaming Network, e le società HBG Entertainment e HBG Online Gaming, titolari di concessioni per il bingo, scommesse e gioco online. NOVOMATIC Italia è una delle più grandi aziende italiane nel panorama del gioco sicuro e legale regolato dall’Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli. Per saperne di più visita il nostro sito: www.novomatic.it

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 627
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boyd-gaming.jpeg
Boyd Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novomatic-italia.jpeg
Novomatic Italia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boyd Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Novomatic Italia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

Boyd Gaming has 601.75% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Novomatic Italia in 2025.

Incident History — Boyd Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boyd Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Novomatic Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novomatic Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boyd-gaming.jpeg
Boyd Gaming
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Financial Gain, Fraud/Identity Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novomatic-italia.jpeg
Novomatic Italia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Novomatic Italia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boyd Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boyd Gaming company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Novomatic Italia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Boyd Gaming company has reported more cyber incidents than Novomatic Italia company.

Neither Novomatic Italia company nor Boyd Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Boyd Gaming company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Novomatic Italia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Novomatic Italia company nor Boyd Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boyd Gaming company nor Novomatic Italia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Novomatic Italia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boyd Gaming company.

Boyd Gaming company employs more people globally than Novomatic Italia company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boyd Gaming nor Novomatic Italia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H