Comparison Overview

Boyd Blue

VS

Fantastic Holdings Limited

Boyd Blue

15, ORMEAU, 4028, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

With a desire to bring beautiful textiles to Australia, owner and director Shelley Boyd started selling fabric to designers from out of her car in 1999. From these humble beginnings, Boyd Blue is today run by a team of Sales and Operations professionals passionate about supplying designer furniture and home decor to the interior design, architecture and property development industries. Now a nation-wide industry leader, Boyd Blue is ever-expanding and is turning heads. Our presence at tradeshows and in the media has garnered us a reputation for being one of the best suppliers of unique product that is consistently presented in settings and showrooms that inspire. We are proud of our eye for detail and expert craftsmanship, combined with a focus on collections suitable for both domestic and commercial application. With an ever-growing portfolio, we now source our ranges from all over the world. With suppliers in Australia, Italy, Indonesia, The Philippines, Thailand, India and Portugal, we are proud of our continuing efforts in finding the best quality products that provide inspired ranges for our customer’s projects.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fantastic Holdings Limited

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Fantastic Holdings Limited (ASX:FAN) is a leading Australian furniture retailer and manufacturer. FHL operates over 134 stores across five furniture retail chains including, national retailers Fantastic Furniture, Plush and the Original Mattress Factory in NSW and ACT. FHL is also Australia's largest sofa manufacturer, has one of the country's leading mattress manufacturers and operates a national supply chain to service all FHL's retail brands.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boyd-blue.jpeg
Boyd Blue
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fantastic-holdings-limited.jpeg
Fantastic Holdings Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boyd Blue
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fantastic Holdings Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boyd Blue in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fantastic Holdings Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Boyd Blue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boyd Blue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fantastic Holdings Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fantastic Holdings Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boyd-blue.jpeg
Boyd Blue
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fantastic-holdings-limited.jpeg
Fantastic Holdings Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fantastic Holdings Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boyd Blue company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fantastic Holdings Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boyd Blue company.

In the current year, Fantastic Holdings Limited company and Boyd Blue company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fantastic Holdings Limited company nor Boyd Blue company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fantastic Holdings Limited company nor Boyd Blue company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fantastic Holdings Limited company nor Boyd Blue company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boyd Blue company nor Fantastic Holdings Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boyd Blue company nor Fantastic Holdings Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fantastic Holdings Limited company employs more people globally than Boyd Blue company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boyd Blue nor Fantastic Holdings Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.