Comparison Overview

Boy & Bird Collective

VS

schraepler communication

Boy & Bird Collective

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Boy & Bird Collective is an Australian based graphic design studio who offer high-impact solutions for print, web and digital applications. We are based in Australia, however we work closely with our clients from all parts of the world to create exciting and effective visual solutions. As a full service design studio, we provide comprehensive design services, handling all aspects of a project, from concept development to the finished product. We have a wealth of experience including logo development/business branding, advertising material, web design, building and vehicle signage, product packaging and much more. We love to collaborate closely with our clients to assist you with putting your ideas to paper (or screen!), understanding that function and purpose is as important and beauty and creativity.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

schraepler communication

Vordere Cramergasse 11-13, Nürnberg, 90478, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

schraepler communication konzipiert Kommunikationslösungen und setzt diese um: Für Printmedien, Onlinemedien, Multimedia, Audio, Firmenpräsentationen und Werbemittel. Unsere Tätigkeit beinhaltet Grafik, Layout und Illustration, aber auch die Programmierung von HTML/CSS-Templates, Animation, Fotografie und Musikproduktion. Agenturdienstleistungen wie Anzeigenschaltung, Budgetverwaltung und Projektleitung bei Projekten mit mehreren zu koordinierenden Dienstleistern runden unser Leistungsspektrum ab. Die Kooperation mit Partnern aus verschiedenen Branchen erweitert unser Portfolio zudem um folgende Punkte: Weitergehende Internet-Dienstleistungen (CMS, Social Media Marketing, Onlinewerbung, Shoplösungen, Groupwarelösungen, Hosting), Video (DVD, Werbespots), Messebau, Großformatdruck, Objektbeschriftung, Druckerzeugnisse sowie Werbemittel aller Art. Unsere Kunden erstrecken sich von Existenzgründern über mittelständische Unternehmen v.a. aus dem Gesundheitsbereich und Industrie bis hin zu Bildungseinrichtungen und staatliche Initiativen in Form von Beschäftigungspakten mehrerer Regionen. Unsere Zielsetzung ist eine vertrauensvolle langjährige Zusammenarbeit mit unseren Kunden, Mitarbeitern und Lieferanten, was sich in Termintreue, verlässlicher Kalkulation, ehrlicher Beratung und einem hohen Anteil an langjährigen Bestandskunden und Kooperationen niederschlägt.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boy-&-bird-collective.jpeg
Boy & Bird Collective
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schraepler-communication.jpeg
schraepler communication
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boy & Bird Collective
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
schraepler communication
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boy & Bird Collective in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for schraepler communication in 2025.

Incident History — Boy & Bird Collective (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boy & Bird Collective cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — schraepler communication (X = Date, Y = Severity)

schraepler communication cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boy-&-bird-collective.jpeg
Boy & Bird Collective
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schraepler-communication.jpeg
schraepler communication
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

schraepler communication company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boy & Bird Collective company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, schraepler communication company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boy & Bird Collective company.

In the current year, schraepler communication company and Boy & Bird Collective company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither schraepler communication company nor Boy & Bird Collective company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither schraepler communication company nor Boy & Bird Collective company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither schraepler communication company nor Boy & Bird Collective company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective company nor schraepler communication company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective company nor schraepler communication company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

schraepler communication company employs more people globally than Boy & Bird Collective company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boy & Bird Collective nor schraepler communication holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X