Comparison Overview

Boxer & Co.

VS

Actual Source

Boxer & Co.

2a Gladstone Street, Newtown, NSW, 2042, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Boxes, bottles and everything in-between, we're a Sydney-based design agency, specialising in packaging and branding. Sign up for our newsletter here https://tinyurl.com/24brp5uj Owned by an accomplished international designer and an ex-marketing manager, we have a winning combination of creative, strategic and executional muscle. We go beyond aesthetics, getting to the heart of what makes your brand tick and helping it beat stronger for your customers. And you won’t just be watching from the sidelines. We love nothing more than getting clients involved in the creative process from day one. After all, when you live and breathe a brand, you’re one of the few people who really know what it’s capable of. Our proprietary approach to design has been developed to address the specific needs of packaging and results in effective, award winning creative that stands out and gets purchased. OUR CAPABILITIES: Brand Strategy Name Generation Brand Identity Design Graphic Design for Packaging Structural Packaging Design Point of Sale Design Artwork and Print Production

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Actual Source

50 East 500 North, PROVO, Utah, 84606-7146, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Actual Source is the collaborative design practice of Davis Ngarupe (Cook Islands / USA) and JP Haynie (USA). Together, and with their community of collaborators, they design and execute publications, visual identities, websites, packaging, apparel, and physical spaces for clients in many diverse fields at large and small scale. Recent projects include a new publishing initiative for A24, an identity and apparel for Hotel Drugs, an identity and typeface for NikeLab Chicago c/o Virgil Abloh, and Shoplifters Issue 9: DRAWINGS.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boxer-&-co-.jpeg
Boxer & Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actual-source.jpeg
Actual Source
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boxer & Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Actual Source
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boxer & Co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Actual Source in 2025.

Incident History — Boxer & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boxer & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Actual Source (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Actual Source cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boxer-&-co-.jpeg
Boxer & Co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actual-source.jpeg
Actual Source
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boxer & Co. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Actual Source company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Actual Source company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boxer & Co. company.

In the current year, Actual Source company and Boxer & Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Actual Source company nor Boxer & Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Actual Source company nor Boxer & Co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Actual Source company nor Boxer & Co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boxer & Co. company nor Actual Source company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boxer & Co. company nor Actual Source company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Boxer & Co. company employs more people globally than Actual Source company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boxer & Co. nor Actual Source holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X