Comparison Overview

Box1824

VS

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia

Box1824

São Paulo, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Box1824 is a hybrid between a research, futures and strategic consultancy company that develops projects from the first insight to completion. The company was born from the ability to study behaviors and map culture. Our proprietary 3D methodology allows the connection between the present and the future of business. Starting with Detect, which indicates new realities and contexts, going through Decode, where we translate the zeitgeist, and finally Directing, where we transform future visions and behavior mapping into business strategy. For 20 years, Box1824 has been a strategic partner of numerous Brazilian and global companies such as Itaú Unibanco, Stellantis, Vivo, ABInBev, Google and RD. To find out more about our work, get in touch.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia

Level 3, 271 Spring Street , Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

CEDA (the Committee for Economic Development of Australia) is an independent, non-profit organisation providing thought leadership and policy perspectives on the economic and social issues affecting Australia. We conduct independent research, convene conversations nationwide and work with our members across government, academia and business, seeking to achieve long-term prosperity for all Australians. CEDA was founded in 1960 by Sir Douglas Copland.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 165
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/box-1824.jpeg
Box1824
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceda---committee-for-economic-development-of-australia.jpeg
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Box1824
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Box1824 in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Box1824 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Box1824 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/box-1824.jpeg
Box1824
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ceda---committee-for-economic-development-of-australia.jpeg
CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Box1824 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Box1824 company.

In the current year, CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company and Box1824 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Box1824 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Box1824 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company nor Box1824 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Box1824 company nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Box1824 company.

CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia company employs more people globally than Box1824 company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Box1824 nor CEDA - Committee for Economic Development of Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X