Comparison Overview

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing

VS

INTRANAV, an Inpixon company

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing

2925 Old Steele Creek Road, Charlotte, NC, 28208, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing Inc. is a full service industrial distributor, specializing in industrial belting of all types. Headquartered in Charlotte, NC, with a branch in LaGrange, GA, we are perfectly situated to serve customers throughout the Southeast. From our beginning as a manufacturer of textile aprons, to today's broad industrial emphasis, we lead the field in customer service. Bowman Hollis partners with the best belting manufacturers from around the world, so that we can provide exactly the right belt to keep your machinery running. We offer the same service on hose and pneumatic products of all types. Our company is family owned, and has been for over 60 years. All of our employees and customers are part of our extended family, and you are welcome to join us.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

INTRANAV, an Inpixon company

Frankfurter Str. 27, Eschborn, DE, 65760
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The industrial Internet of Things opens the way to the revolution of industry 4.0. INTRANAV opens up and enables the improvement of products and processes in terms of costs, time and quality with INTRALYTICS. To the Software modules include, for example, process automation, the navigation of automated guided vehicle systems (AGV), plant tracking, process mapping and analysis, and occupational safety management. INTRANAV offers a turnkey RTLS platform based on UWB and 5G, which provides all components and services for your Smart-Factory. INTRANAV is an Inpixon Company.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bowman-hollis-manufacturing.jpeg
Bowman Hollis Manufacturing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intranavrtls.jpeg
INTRANAV, an Inpixon company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bowman Hollis Manufacturing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INTRANAV, an Inpixon company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bowman Hollis Manufacturing in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INTRANAV, an Inpixon company in 2025.

Incident History — Bowman Hollis Manufacturing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INTRANAV, an Inpixon company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INTRANAV, an Inpixon company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bowman-hollis-manufacturing.jpeg
Bowman Hollis Manufacturing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intranavrtls.jpeg
INTRANAV, an Inpixon company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company.

In the current year, INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company and Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company.

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company employs more people globally than INTRANAV, an Inpixon company company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing nor INTRANAV, an Inpixon company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H