Comparison Overview

Bowie & Jensen, LLC

VS

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors

Bowie & Jensen, LLC

210 W. Pennsylvania Ave. , Towson, 21204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Empowering Businesses to Succeed Bowie & Jensen is a leading business law firm representing clients in all types of business matters in Maryland and throughout the United States. For over twenty years, the firm has expanded its practice to meet all of the legal needs of its clients. This includes handling litigation and transactional matters for individuals and local, national and international companies. Bowie & Jensen’s practice is broken down into several practice areas, including the following: • Business Litigation • Business Transactions and Mergers and Acquisitions • Commercial Real Estate • Construction • Employment • Estates and Trusts • Intellectual Property • Internet, Technology and Privacy • Tax and Corporate Bowie & Jensen is a full service business law firm, specializing in the needs of any business of any size.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Forster Dean Solicitors specialise in all types of Accident Claims. Whatever type of accident you have had, our specialist Lawyers can help you! With offices in the North West, why not pop into your local branch and see how we can help you. All our staff are friendly, approachable, professional, and will explain everything to you in plain English – no legal jargon! We pride ourselves on providing the very highest standards of service and client care is our number one priority. Don’t just take our word for it, click here to read about what our clients say about us! http://www.forsterdean.co.uk/category/testimonials/ Thinking of Moving House? Our experienced, dedicated property Lawyers will not only put your mind at ease but will keep you updated every step of the way. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA – registration number 517355) For more information, please visit our website or call us on 0151 422 0982. You can also email [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bowie-&-jensen-llc.jpeg
Bowie & Jensen, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forster-dean-limited-solicitors.jpeg
Forster Dean Limited Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bowie & Jensen, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forster Dean Limited Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bowie & Jensen, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forster Dean Limited Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Bowie & Jensen, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bowie & Jensen, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forster Dean Limited Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bowie-&-jensen-llc.jpeg
Bowie & Jensen, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forster-dean-limited-solicitors.jpeg
Forster Dean Limited Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bowie & Jensen, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bowie & Jensen, LLC company.

In the current year, Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company and Bowie & Jensen, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company nor Bowie & Jensen, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company nor Bowie & Jensen, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company nor Bowie & Jensen, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC company nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC company nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company employs more people globally than Bowie & Jensen, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bowie & Jensen, LLC nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X