Comparison Overview

Bow Apple Capital

VS

Sun Life

Bow Apple Capital

Last Update: 2024-08-09 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Bow Apple Capital Group is a leading fintech institution specializing in structured finance solutions for small businesses across the United States. Through innovative invoice factoring and receivables financing strategies the company is focusing on providing efficient access to capital funding - enabling businesses to expand, overcome challenges, and maintain financial stability. With our cutting-edge same-day screening and funding process, we have established ourselves as a trusted partner for entrepreneurs seeking tailored capital solutions. Whether businesses are looking to optimize operations, address specific industry challenges, or bridge gaps in cash flow, Bow Apple Capital Group stands ready to support them with our expertise in structured finance. At Bow Apple Capital Group, we have a deep understanding of the diverse needs of small businesses operating in various industries and growth stages. Leveraging our extensive firsthand knowledge of running successful enterprises, we provide a personalized experience by designing financing solutions that align with the unique requirements of each customer. Our team of experienced professionals works closely with clients to comprehend their goals, overcome challenges, and optimize their financial situation, ensuring that they receive the most suitable funding options available in the market.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sun Life

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, OO
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Sun Life is a leading financial services organization dedicated to helping people achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives. We provide a wide range of insurance and investment products and services in key markets around the world including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, the Philippines and Indonesia. At Sun Life, we have more than 34,000 employees and 112,900 advisors worldwide. Websites: Canada www.sunlife.ca/en/ US www.sunlife.com/us/en/ Vietnam www.sunlife.com.vn Hong Kong www.sunlife.com.hk Indonesia www.sunlife.co.id Malaysia www.sunlife.com.my Philippines www.sunlife.com.ph

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 37,056
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bow-apple-capital.jpeg
Bow Apple Capital
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sun-life-financial.jpeg
Sun Life
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bow Apple Capital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sun Life
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bow Apple Capital in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sun Life in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Bow Apple Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bow Apple Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Sun Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sun Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bow-apple-capital.jpeg
Bow Apple Capital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sun-life-financial.jpeg
Sun Life
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Bow Apple Capital company and Sun Life company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Sun Life company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bow Apple Capital company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sun Life company and Bow Apple Capital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sun Life company nor Bow Apple Capital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sun Life company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Bow Apple Capital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sun Life company nor Bow Apple Capital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bow Apple Capital company nor Sun Life company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Sun Life company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bow Apple Capital company.

Sun Life company employs more people globally than Bow Apple Capital company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X