Comparison Overview

Bovie Printing & Fabrication

VS

CEC Document Services

Bovie Printing & Fabrication

4 Northeast Ave, Bow, NH, 03304, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

At Bovie, our mission is to over deliver on our standing as a leader in technical printing. Through combining our knowledge of the right fit projects with our wealth of industry expertise, we strive to transparently support all of our promises with actions to deliver the highest quality and support and products to our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CEC Document Services

4865 Oakland St, Denver, CO, 80239, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

As a full-service provider, CEC takes care of your digital printing needs so you can focus on your job. Whether it’s a multiple-page color brochure, a lead generation postcard (including metering and mailing), or three-hole punched black & white training manuals, CEC delivers high quality digital printing to meet your deadlines and make print production a breeze. CEC Document Services is one of the largest “All Digital” printing centers in Colorado. Our company is located in a 14,000 square foot facility in Denver, just blocks from the 2nd largest volume post office in the United States. We are a full-service provider since 1991 and offer printing solutions for a range of customers in many different industries, including but not limited to: Education, Technology, Catalog, Manufacturing, Trade Publishing, Healthcare, Real Estate, Wellness, Finance and Government Agencies. We have many national, regional and local companies, including several non-profit organizations, as our customers. CEC provides only the highest quality print services and we pride ourselves on meeting all deadlines. We are happy to furnish over 20 years of customer references upon request.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bovie-screen-process-printing-co-inc.jpeg
Bovie Printing & Fabrication
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cec-document-services.jpeg
CEC Document Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bovie Printing & Fabrication
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEC Document Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bovie Printing & Fabrication in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEC Document Services in 2025.

Incident History — Bovie Printing & Fabrication (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bovie Printing & Fabrication cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEC Document Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEC Document Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bovie-screen-process-printing-co-inc.jpeg
Bovie Printing & Fabrication
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cec-document-services.jpeg
CEC Document Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEC Document Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bovie Printing & Fabrication company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CEC Document Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bovie Printing & Fabrication company.

In the current year, CEC Document Services company and Bovie Printing & Fabrication company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CEC Document Services company nor Bovie Printing & Fabrication company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CEC Document Services company nor Bovie Printing & Fabrication company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CEC Document Services company nor Bovie Printing & Fabrication company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication company nor CEC Document Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication company nor CEC Document Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bovie Printing & Fabrication company employs more people globally than CEC Document Services company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bovie Printing & Fabrication nor CEC Document Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N