Comparison Overview
Bouygues Group
Bouygues Group
32, Avenue Hoche, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 04/10/2026
Founded in 1952 by Francis Bouygues, Bouygues is a diversified services group operating in over 80 countries with 200,000 employees all working to make life better every day. Its business activities in construction (Bouygues Construction, Bouygues Immobilier, Colas); en...
Bechtel Corporation
Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Bouygues Group
Bechtel Corporation
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bouygues Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
Bechtel Corporation has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Bouygues Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bouygues Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Bouygues Group
Bechtel Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.