Comparison Overview

Bouygues Construction

VS

KEC International Ltd.

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, 1 Avenue Eugène Freyssinet, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, None, FR, 78 280
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bouygues-construction.com/

With 32,500 employees working in 60 countries, Bouygues Construction designs, builds and rehabilitates the infrastructures and buildings that are essential for a sustainable society. All over the world, the teams support the development of low-carbon energy production and public transport infrastructures and provide their expertise in the design, construction and renovation of buildings and neighbourhoods essential to life (health, education, work, tourism, leisure, public services, defence, etc.). The teams' commitment is based on three top priorities: safety culture, respect for human rights and ethics.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 25,265
Subsidiaries: 119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

KEC International Ltd.

1st Floor, RPG House, 463, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 030
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kecrpg.com/

KEC International Limited, the flagship company of RPG Enterprises is a diversified global infrastructure Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) major, with a presence in the verticals of Power Transmission & Distribution, Railways, Civil, Urban Infrastructure, Oil & Gas Pipelines, Solar, Smart Infra and Cables. KEC is a USD 2.4 billion diversified infrastructure EPC major building infrastructure globally. With over seven decades of experience, footprint in 110+ countries and presently executing projects in 30+ countries, KEC has made an indelible mark on the world map. Through constant and consistent re-engineering KEC reinvents itself to retain its leadership position in the areas of quality, technology, capacity and capability. KEC's strengths lie in the areas of Design, Manufacturing, Supply and Construction of Turnkey Projects of Power Transmission lines of voltages up to 1,200 kV, in setting up Sub-stations and power Distribution Networks, Optical Fibre Cable (OPGW) installations, turnkey railway infrastructure, civil infrastructure projects & renewable energy projects. KEC has one of the largest global annual production capacities of 4,22,000 MTs, which includes the production of towers, poles, hardware, structures for railways & solar. The company has 8 factories in India, UAE and the Americas. The Company has over 9,000 employees from 35+ nationalities.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 12,425
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues-construction.jpeg
Bouygues Construction
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kec-international-ltd..jpeg
KEC International Ltd.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bouygues Construction
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KEC International Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KEC International Ltd. in 2026.

Incident History — Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KEC International Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KEC International Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues-construction.jpeg
Bouygues Construction
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain, Data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kec-international-ltd..jpeg
KEC International Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bouygues Construction company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KEC International Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bouygues Construction company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KEC International Ltd. company has not reported any.

In the current year, KEC International Ltd. company and Bouygues Construction company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Bouygues Construction company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while KEC International Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Bouygues Construction company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other KEC International Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Bouygues Construction company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while KEC International Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bouygues Construction company nor KEC International Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bouygues Construction company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KEC International Ltd. company.

Bouygues Construction company employs more people globally than KEC International Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bouygues Construction nor KEC International Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References