Comparison Overview

Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA)

VS

Grand Rapids Public Museum

Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA)

1750 13th Street, Boulder, CO, 80302, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bmoca.org

Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) is a catalyst for creative experiences through the exploration of significant art of our time. Located in a historic building in the heart of downtown Boulder, BMoCA presents exhibitions of work by regional, national, and international artists at the forefront of contemporary art as well as thought-provoking programs for all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Grand Rapids Public Museum

272 Pearl Street, Grand Rapids, MI, 49504, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grpm.org

The Grand Rapids Public Museum is the only cultural institution that captures the spirit of West Michigan through authentic, immersive and transformative experiences in education and entertainment. Our vision is to inspire passionate curiosity and a deeper understanding of the world around us. Mission: We exist to be a living monument of artifacts, ideas and stories told through exhibitions, events and educational programming designed to inspire, motivate and celebrate our human bond. We enrich the life of our community through experiences of the wider world in a uniquely Grand Rapids context.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boulder-museum-of-contemporary-art.jpeg
Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-rapids-public-museum.jpeg
Grand Rapids Public Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grand Rapids Public Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Rapids Public Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grand Rapids Public Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Rapids Public Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boulder-museum-of-contemporary-art.jpeg
Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-rapids-public-museum.jpeg
Grand Rapids Public Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grand Rapids Public Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grand Rapids Public Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company.

In the current year, Grand Rapids Public Museum company and Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grand Rapids Public Museum company nor Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grand Rapids Public Museum company nor Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grand Rapids Public Museum company nor Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company nor Grand Rapids Public Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company nor Grand Rapids Public Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grand Rapids Public Museum company employs more people globally than Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art (BMoCA) nor Grand Rapids Public Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References