Comparison Overview

Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law

VS

The 36 Group

Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law

1300 NW 17th Ave #255, Delray Beach, Florida, 33445, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

For many people, getting arrested and facing unknown consequences is a terrifying experience. Criminal convictions may last a lifetime. You should not attempt to navigate the criminal justice system alone. You need an attorney who can analyze the State’s case against you and prepare a legal defense. Failing to do so may result in disastrous consequences. You should never enter a plea to any criminal charge without speaking to a Palm Beach criminal defense attorney. Criminal convictions carry numerous collateral consequences such as the loss of driving privileges, the loss of the ability to own a firearm, and the loss of the ability to vote. Call us at (561)-588-2781 and schedule a free consultation. We will address all of your concerns. Personal injuries are very common due to another person’s negligence or wrongdoing. Injuries may arise due to an automobile accident, slip/trip and fall, work accident, medical malpractice, a defective product, or other situations. It is important to hold the at-fault party and insurance carrier responsible for the at-fault party’s wrongdoing. At Bottari and Doyle, P.A., we will find the source of insurance coverage, investigate liability, and pursue compensation for you. You may be legally entitled to recover money from the at-fault party to pay for your medical bills, lost wages and pain and suffering. Call us at (561)-588-2781 for a free consultation to discuss your personal injury case. We always take personal injury cases on a contingency fee basis. There is no upfront cost to you.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The 36 Group

4 Field Court, London, WC1R 5, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The 36 Group is ranked as a "Leading Set" of barristers' chambers in Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners, the leading lawyers' directories in the United Kingdom. The 36 Group is a multi-specialist set of barristers' Chambers located in the prestigious building at 4 Field Court, Gray’s Inn, which is generally considered to be one of the most impressive stand-alone buildings in any of the four Inns of Court. With over 170 barristers, mediators and arbitrators (including 14 King’s Counsel (KCs/Silks), 3 Senior Counsel (SCs/Silks) from Ireland and South Africa, and a Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India), The 36 Group is one of the largest London based sets. It is the preferred choice for many firms of solicitors, foreign law firms, public bodies, businesses, and individual members of the public. Within The 36 Group, dedicated practice groups provide specialist legal services that include advice, the drafting of agreements and other documents, and courtroom, tribunal, and arbitral advocacy. The 36 Group's barristers specialise principally in the following areas of law: crime, employment, family, immigration, property, private client and contentious probate, and shipping and international trade. Each of the main practice groups are readily recognisable by the prefix "36" followed by the relevant subject area of law, as in "36 Crime", “36 Family”, "36 Public & Human Rights”, and “36 Stone”. The Group's barristers are reputed to combine legal expertise and trial advocacy skills to an impressive level, whilst remaining sensitive to the needs of the client, irrespective of whether the client happens to be an individual, a partnership or a corporate entity, a public body or the Government of a foreign State. Some members also act as mediators and/or as arbitrators. William Tyler KC and Christopher Donnellan KC lead the 36 Group as Joint Heads of Chambers and co-Chairs of its Executive Board.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bottari-&-doyle-p.a..jpeg
Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/36-bedford-row.jpeg
The 36 Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The 36 Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The 36 Group in 2025.

Incident History — Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The 36 Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The 36 Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bottari-&-doyle-p.a..jpeg
Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/36-bedford-row.jpeg
The 36 Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The 36 Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The 36 Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company.

In the current year, The 36 Group company and Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The 36 Group company nor Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The 36 Group company nor Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The 36 Group company nor Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company nor The 36 Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company nor The 36 Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The 36 Group company employs more people globally than Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bottari & Doyle Attorneys at Law nor The 36 Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X