Comparison Overview

Boston University School of Public Health

VS

UNSW

Boston University School of Public Health

715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, US, 02118
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Ranked in the top 10 schools and programs of public health in the world by US News and World Report, Boston University School of Public Health provides the opportunity to engage in world-renowned research, scholarship, social justice, and public health practice. Founded in 1976, BUSPH offers master- and doctoral-level education in public health, as well as continuing learning opportunities. The faculty in six departments (biostatistics; community health sciences; environmental health; epidemiology; global health; and health law, policy & management) conduct policy-changing public health research around the world, with the mission of improving the health of populations—especially the disadvantaged, underserved, and vulnerable—locally, nationally, and internationally.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,518
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

UNSW

Gate 9, High St Kensington 2052, Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), AU, 2052
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 800 and 849

The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is one of Australia's leading research and teaching universities. Established in 1949, UNSW has expanded rapidly and now has more than 52,000 students, including more than 14,000 international students from over 130 different countries. UNSW offers more than 300 undergraduate and 600 postgraduate programs, and has developed an extensive network of alumni chapters throughout Asia. UNSW is a founding member of the prestigious Group of Eight research intensive universities in Australia and a member of the Universitas 21 international consortium. The main UNSW campus is located on a 38-hectare site at Kensington, in Sydney. Other campuses are UNSW Art and Design (Paddington), UNSW Canberra (Canberra City and Australian Defence Force Academy), and sub-campuses at Randwick and Coogee, as well as research stations around NSW. We believe in academic freedom, so posts do not necessarily represent official UNSW views. Read our Social Media Terms of Service at www.unsw.to/sm UNSW Sydney CRICOS no.00098G facebook.com/unsw twitter.com/unsw instagram.com/unsw youtube.com/unsw

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,231
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-university-school-of-public-health.jpeg
Boston University School of Public Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unsw.jpeg
UNSW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boston University School of Public Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UNSW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston University School of Public Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW in 2026.

Incident History — Boston University School of Public Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston University School of Public Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UNSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-university-school-of-public-health.jpeg
Boston University School of Public Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unsw.jpeg
UNSW
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UNSW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston University School of Public Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, UNSW company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boston University School of Public Health company.

In the current year, UNSW company and Boston University School of Public Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UNSW company nor Boston University School of Public Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither UNSW company nor Boston University School of Public Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UNSW company nor Boston University School of Public Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health company nor UNSW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston University School of Public Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UNSW company.

UNSW company employs more people globally than Boston University School of Public Health company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor UNSW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H