Comparison Overview

Boston University School of Public Health

VS

Nanyang Technological University Singapore

Boston University School of Public Health

715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, US, 02118
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bu.edu/sph/

Ranked in the top 10 schools and programs of public health in the world by US News and World Report, Boston University School of Public Health provides the opportunity to engage in world-renowned research, scholarship, social justice, and public health practice. Founded in 1976, BUSPH offers master- and doctoral-level education in public health, as well as continuing learning opportunities. The faculty in six departments (biostatistics; community health sciences; environmental health; epidemiology; global health; and health law, policy & management) conduct policy-changing public health research around the world, with the mission of improving the health of populations—especially the disadvantaged, underserved, and vulnerable—locally, nationally, and internationally.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,518
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nanyang Technological University Singapore

50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, Singapore, singapore, SG, 639798
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ntu.edu.sg/

A research-intensive public university, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 33,000 undergraduate and postgraduate students in the Engineering, Business, Science, Medicine, Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences, and Graduate colleges. NTU is also home to world-renowned autonomous institutes – the National Institute of Education, S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Earth Observatory of Singapore, and Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering – and various leading research centres such as the Nanyang Environment & Water Research Institute (NEWRI) and Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N). NTU’s campus is frequently listed among the Top 15 most beautiful university campuses in the world and has 57 Green Mark-certified (equivalent to LEED-certified) building projects comprising more than 230 buildings, of which 95% are certified Green Mark Platinum. Besides its 200-ha (500-acre) lush green campus in the western part of Singapore, NTU also has a second campus in the heart of Novena, Singapore’s medical district. A cosmopolitan hub of more than 100 nationalities, the NTU community comprises about 5,000 faculty and researchers. We invite you to be part of this world-class university. Connect with us at: www.facebook.com/NTUsg www.twitter.com/NTUsg www.youtube.com/NTUsg www.instagram.com/NTU_sg Note: Posts containing profanity, hate speech, and offensive or inappropriate language and content will be deleted.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,199
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-university-school-of-public-health.jpeg
Boston University School of Public Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntusg.jpeg
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boston University School of Public Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston University School of Public Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nanyang Technological University Singapore in 2026.

Incident History — Boston University School of Public Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston University School of Public Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nanyang Technological University Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nanyang Technological University Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-university-school-of-public-health.jpeg
Boston University School of Public Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntusg.jpeg
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nanyang Technological University Singapore company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston University School of Public Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nanyang Technological University Singapore company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boston University School of Public Health company.

In the current year, Nanyang Technological University Singapore company and Boston University School of Public Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nanyang Technological University Singapore company nor Boston University School of Public Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nanyang Technological University Singapore company nor Boston University School of Public Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nanyang Technological University Singapore company nor Boston University School of Public Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health company nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston University School of Public Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nanyang Technological University Singapore company.

Boston University School of Public Health company employs more people globally than Nanyang Technological University Singapore company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boston University School of Public Health nor Nanyang Technological University Singapore holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References