Comparison Overview

Boston Signs & Printing

VS

Printing Palace, Inc.

Boston Signs & Printing

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Boston Signs & Printing Located in the heart of Boston Massachusetts, Boston Signs and Printing is Massachusetts's #1 printing firm. We specialize in Vinyl Banner Printing, Signs & Signage, Mesh Banners, Event Backdrops, Posters, Vehicle Wraps, Window Stickers, Truck Lettering, A-Frame Signs, Sidewalk Signs, & Wide-Format Printing. Let our team of experts handle your printing project from inception and design all the way to the "wow" factor your audience will experience. We pride ourselves in having the quickest turnaround time in the industry. Give us a Call, Text, or Email today! (781) 369-5799 | [email protected] | 1 Cambridge St. Boston, MA. 02108

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Printing Palace, Inc.

2300 Lincoln Blvd., Santa Monica, California, 90405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Printing Palace is located in Santa Monica, California and is owned and operated by Eli Albek. Printing Palace has been serving Santa Monica and the surrounding Los Angeles area for 28 years. It has grown into a complete communication company, helping business and institutions with their marketing, promotional, communications and complete printing needs. Additionally, we offer our clients competitive pricing, for top quality work, that's guaranteed to meet their satisfaction. Currently we occupy an 7,000 square foot facility that includes a complete Pre-Press Department with a Graphic Artist to start your project off right. The Press and Bindery Department will complete your project and give you the edge you need to stand out and be noticed. If you have any questions; our fast and friendly customer service staff will be here to answer and assist you with all your needs. In October 2009, Printing Palace implemented an online ordering system. You can view this system by visiting https://online.printingpalace.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-signs-&-printing.jpeg
Boston Signs & Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boston Signs & Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printing Palace, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Signs & Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Palace, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Boston Signs & Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Signs & Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printing Palace, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Palace, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-signs-&-printing.jpeg
Boston Signs & Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printing Palace, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston Signs & Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Printing Palace, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boston Signs & Printing company.

In the current year, Printing Palace, Inc. company and Boston Signs & Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Boston Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Boston Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Boston Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Printing Palace, Inc. company employs more people globally than Boston Signs & Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boston Signs & Printing nor Printing Palace, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N