Comparison Overview

Boston Lyric Opera

15 Channel Center Street, Boston, 02210, US

Last Update: 2025-12-09

Between 750 and 799

http://www.blo.org

Founded in 1976, Boston Lyric Opera is New England’ s largest opera company. Led by Acting General & Artistic Director Bradley Vernatter, BLO is celebrated for its artistic excellence and diverse repertoire. BLO’ s programs are funded in part by a grant from the Massachusetts Cultural Council and the National Endowment for the Arts.

NAICS: 7111

NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies

Employees: 91

Subsidiaries: 0

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

Saratoga Performing Arts Center

108 Avenue Of The Pines, None, Saratoga Springs, New York, US, 12866-6296

Last Update: 2025-12-09

Between 750 and 799

http://www.spac.org

Diverse artistry thrives at Saratoga Performing Arts Center, the cultural hub of upstate New York, the Hudson Valley, Vermont, the Berkshires, Connecticut, and nearby Canada. SPAC hosts the New York City Ballet, The Philadelphia Orchestra and Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center each summer, in an acoustically ideal amphitheatre in the heart of Spa State Park; presents superior chamber music, jazz, rock and pop concerts, opera, and Saratoga Wine & Food Festival; and oversees the National Museum of Dance. We welcome loyal friends and families familiar with SPAC's incredible performing arts program, and encourage newcomers to explore this region's premier cultural centerpiece.

NAICS: 7111

NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies

Employees: 97

Subsidiaries: 0

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-lyric-opera.jpeg

Boston Lyric Opera

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saratogaperformingartscenter.jpeg

Saratoga Performing Arts Center

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Lyric Opera in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saratoga Performing Arts Center in 2025.

Incident History — Boston Lyric Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Lyric Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Saratoga Performing Arts Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saratoga Performing Arts Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-lyric-opera.jpeg

Boston Lyric Opera

Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saratogaperformingartscenter.jpeg

Saratoga Performing Arts Center

Incidents

No Incident

Both Boston Lyric Opera company and Saratoga Performing Arts Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Saratoga Performing Arts Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boston Lyric Opera company.

In the current year, Saratoga Performing Arts Center company and Boston Lyric Opera company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Saratoga Performing Arts Center company nor Boston Lyric Opera company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Saratoga Performing Arts Center company nor Boston Lyric Opera company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Saratoga Performing Arts Center company nor Boston Lyric Opera company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera company nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera company nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Saratoga Performing Arts Center company employs more people globally than Boston Lyric Opera company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boston Lyric Opera nor Saratoga Performing Arts Center holds GDPR certification.

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published

Date

2025-12-14

Updated

Date

2025-12-14

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.1

Severity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://docs.nxlog.co/agent/current/release-notes.html#nxlog-agent-6-11

Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published

Date

2025-12-14

Updated

Date

2025-12-14

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 2.9

Severity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published

Date

2025-12-14

Updated

Date

2025-12-14

Risk Information

cvss2

Base: 5.0

Severity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

cvss3

Base: 4.3

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base: 5.3

Severity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

References

Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published

Date

2025-12-14

Updated

Date

2025-12-14

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 4.5

Severity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L

References

https://github.com/mjmlio/mjml/issues/3018

Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published

Date

2025-12-14

Updated

Date

2025-12-14

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 5.8

Severity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

References