Comparison Overview

Boston Cyberarts

VS

Buffalo Museum of Science

Boston Cyberarts

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Boston Cyberarts, Inc. is a non-profit arts organization created to foster, develop and present a wide spectrum of media arts including electronic and digital experimental arts programming. We exhibit and promote the media and digital arts of Boston, New England and the world to audiences in the New England region and beyond and by doing so, helping to promote a sense of media and digital literacy, locally and regionally.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Buffalo Museum of Science

1020 Humboldt Pkwy, Buffalo, NY, 14211, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Why? It may be the greatest question of all. Why? It’s born of wonder and curiosity. Why? It makes us think and makes us better. Why? It moves us forward. For nearly a century, the Buffalo Museum of Science has been a resource for why. Answering many times over. And then asking it again. From exhibits that captivate, to a staff that guides, to a collection that inspires, we are about perpetuating the amazing question of why in all who walk our halls. This is what science is about. And everything is about science. So come explore, discover, wonder, reason, reflect, observe, absorb, realize, dream, and – most important – question. Find why at the Buffalo Museum of Science.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-cyberarts.jpeg
Boston Cyberarts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-museum-of-science.jpeg
Buffalo Museum of Science
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boston Cyberarts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Buffalo Museum of Science
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Cyberarts in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo Museum of Science in 2026.

Incident History — Boston Cyberarts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Cyberarts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Buffalo Museum of Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo Museum of Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-cyberarts.jpeg
Boston Cyberarts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-museum-of-science.jpeg
Buffalo Museum of Science
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boston Cyberarts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buffalo Museum of Science company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Buffalo Museum of Science company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boston Cyberarts company.

In the current year, Buffalo Museum of Science company and Boston Cyberarts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Buffalo Museum of Science company nor Boston Cyberarts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Buffalo Museum of Science company nor Boston Cyberarts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Buffalo Museum of Science company nor Boston Cyberarts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boston Cyberarts company nor Buffalo Museum of Science company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boston Cyberarts company nor Buffalo Museum of Science company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Buffalo Museum of Science company employs more people globally than Boston Cyberarts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boston Cyberarts nor Buffalo Museum of Science holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H