Comparison Overview

Borowitz & Clark, LLP

VS

Kentucky Law Journal

Borowitz & Clark, LLP

100 N Barranca St, West Covina, 91791, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Call us today at 877-439-9717! Borowitz & Clark have represented over 40,000 people through the bankruptcy process, and our partners have gained national recognition for their work helping Californians rebuild their financial lives. Borowitz & Clark, LLP is a leading consumer bankruptcy law firm that has adapted to virtually serve clients throughout Southern California. Skip the commute and let us help you from the comfort and safety of your own home. The partners, Barry Borowitz and Erik Clark, are both board certified consumer bankruptcy specialists as certified by the American Board of Certification and are known as two of the best consumer bankruptcy lawyers in Southern California. Our award winning associate attorneys are also highly experienced and have helped thousands of consumers successfully resolve their financial issues. Our firm also has a hardworking team of dedicated staff members to assist our clients through this difficult time in their lives. The main objective at Borowitz & Clark is to help our clients get past this difficult time and get back on the road to enjoying their lives. We strive to make the bankruptcy process understandable for our clients by explaining all available options and detailing how the process works. We find that by taking the time to explain the process it helps to reduce the anxiety and fear that most people facing financial hardships are going through.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kentucky Law Journal

620 S. Limestone St., Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0048, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Kentucky Law Journal, established in 1881, is the tenth oldest continually-published law review in the nation. Publication has been continuous since 1913. The Journal publishes four annual issues in print as well as online original articles and notes. The Journal is edited by a student editorial board, with guidance from a faculty advisor. Each issue contains articles written by prominent national scholars and notes written by Journal members that encompass a broad range of legal topics. The Journal’s primary commitment is to publish scholarly articles of interest to the legal community. In this pursuit, the Journal serves as an integral element in the process of education for the best students at the College of Law by training said students in the finest form of legal research and writing. The Journal also affords said students opportunities for collaboration, and by publishing student works, the Journal also functions as an elegant forum for student ideas and activism. Beyond the College of Law, the Journal serves the legal and academic community as an arena for vigorous debate about the law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borowitz-&-clark-llp.jpeg
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kentucky-law-journal.jpeg
Kentucky Law Journal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kentucky Law Journal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Borowitz & Clark, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kentucky Law Journal in 2025.

Incident History — Borowitz & Clark, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Borowitz & Clark, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kentucky Law Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kentucky Law Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borowitz-&-clark-llp.jpeg
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kentucky-law-journal.jpeg
Kentucky Law Journal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Borowitz & Clark, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kentucky Law Journal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kentucky Law Journal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Borowitz & Clark, LLP company.

In the current year, Kentucky Law Journal company and Borowitz & Clark, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kentucky Law Journal company nor Borowitz & Clark, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kentucky Law Journal company nor Borowitz & Clark, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kentucky Law Journal company nor Borowitz & Clark, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP company nor Kentucky Law Journal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP company nor Kentucky Law Journal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kentucky Law Journal company employs more people globally than Borowitz & Clark, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Borowitz & Clark, LLP nor Kentucky Law Journal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X