Comparison Overview

Bording Sverige

VS

United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group

Bording Sverige

Helsingborg, Borås, Pålsboda, Stockholm, 501 13, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Bording startade 1792 sitt första tryckeri och sedan dess har vi hjälpt våra kunder att producera deras kommunikation. Vi kan design, tryck, distribution och är erkänt bra på att hålla ihop komplicerade projekt. Alla Bordings tjänster och lösningar har sin utgångspunkt i att frigöra resurser hos våra kunder så att de kan fokusera på sin egen kärnverksamhet. Vi har det stora bolagets muskler, ekonomiska resurser samt det lilla bolagets service och omtanke om våra kunder. Bording är en helhetsleverantör som gärna pratar produkt men ännu hellre lösning. Vi skapar störst värde för våra kunder när vi är delaktiga i hela processen från val och utformning av kommunikationslösning, via smart grafisk design till distribution och leverans. Vi har såväl egen produktion som ett stort nätverk av underleverantörer vilket gör att vi kan erbjuda de produkter och tjänster som är nödvändiga för våra kunders kommunikation. Självklart hanterar vi också lagring, logistik, distribution och har riktigt bra frakt- och portolösningar. Vi kan det här – vi har gjort det i snart 230 år Sedan 1792 har vi hjälpt våra kunder att få ut sitt budskap och sin kommunikation till sina kunder, från ett lokalt litet tryckeri till att bli en skandinavisk koncern som jobbar med kommunikation. Bording när du behöver en bättre lösning!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group

1864 S Elmhurst Rd, Mount Prospect, Illinois, 60056, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We help companies bring in new customers, increase sales, and stay in touch with current customers. We do this through: - Printed Marketing and Advertising pieces - Direct Mail Campaigns - Signs and Banner - Custom Boxes - E-mail Campaigns - Mobile web pages - And many other marketing channels We meet tight production deadlines We are Experts in Print and Mail Design Over 95 YEARS in business!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bording-ab.jpeg
Bording Sverige
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-graphics-&-mailing-group.jpeg
United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bording Sverige
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bording Sverige in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group in 2025.

Incident History — Bording Sverige (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bording Sverige cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bording-ab.jpeg
Bording Sverige
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-graphics-&-mailing-group.jpeg
United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bording Sverige company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bording Sverige company.

In the current year, United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company and Bording Sverige company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company nor Bording Sverige company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company nor Bording Sverige company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company nor Bording Sverige company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bording Sverige company nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bording Sverige company nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bording Sverige company employs more people globally than United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bording Sverige nor United GMG - United Graphics & Mailing Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L