Comparison Overview

Borchard & Callahan, APC

VS

Twenty Essex

Borchard & Callahan, APC

25909 Pala, Suite 300, Mission Viejo, 92691, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 750 and 799

Borchard & Callahan, APC strives to provide legal services of the highest quality in a cost efficient fashion. The firm forms alliances where appropriate with specialists in all areas of the law, other professions and industries, so that for any one problem, the best available resources are applied. Borchard & Callahan is dedicated to delivering high quality dispute resolution services at affordable rates. Relying on current technology, and collaboration with the client to solve problems, the firm is able to maintain the highest standards of practice expected while achieving the client's goals in a cost efficient manner.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Twenty Essex

20 Essex Street, London, undefined, WC2R 3AL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A leading commercial set of chambers, the barristers of Twenty Essex offer outstanding legal minds combined with a modern and commercial disputes experience. Our clients include major global companies, institutions, governments and their advisors from around the world and our barristers advise and appear as advocates in court or arbitration in relation to a broad range of company and commercial, EU, competition, and public international law disputes. Practices involve the preparation and conduct of litigation before a wide range of courts and tribunals, in the UK, in foreign jurisdictions as well as on the international stage. The vast majority of the work is international in nature and we have well-established links to many overseas markets, including through our Asian hub in Singapore servicing clients throughout Asia Pacific and beyond. The set is also home to a number of highly respected domestic and international arbitrators and mediators, some of whom were previously judges either in the UK or overseas.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borchard-&-callahan-apc.jpeg
Borchard & Callahan, APC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/20-essex-st.jpeg
Twenty Essex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Borchard & Callahan, APC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Twenty Essex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Borchard & Callahan, APC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Twenty Essex in 2025.

Incident History — Borchard & Callahan, APC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Borchard & Callahan, APC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Twenty Essex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Twenty Essex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borchard-&-callahan-apc.jpeg
Borchard & Callahan, APC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/20-essex-st.jpeg
Twenty Essex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Borchard & Callahan, APC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Twenty Essex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Twenty Essex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Borchard & Callahan, APC company.

In the current year, Twenty Essex company and Borchard & Callahan, APC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Twenty Essex company nor Borchard & Callahan, APC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Twenty Essex company nor Borchard & Callahan, APC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Twenty Essex company nor Borchard & Callahan, APC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC company nor Twenty Essex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC company nor Twenty Essex company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Twenty Essex company employs more people globally than Borchard & Callahan, APC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Borchard & Callahan, APC nor Twenty Essex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X