Comparison Overview

Boost Mobile

VS

Telcel

Boost Mobile

5701 S Santa Fe Dr, Littleton, 80120, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

A fresh take on wireless.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 6,380
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Telcel

Lago Zurich, Granada, Distrito Federal, 11520, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Telcel (Radiomóvil Dipsa) es subsidiaria de América Móvil, uno de los mayores proveedores de comunicaciones celulares de Latinoamérica, grupo líder con inversiones en telecomunicaciones en varios países del continente americano. Telcel es la empresa de telefonía celular líder en México. Nuestra solidez y estructura nos consolidan gracias a la especialización y actualización permanente de todas las personas que trabajamos en ella. Todos nosotros estamos comprometidos a satisfacer de manera eficaz y constante todas las necesidades de comunicación inalámbrica de nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15,551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boost-mobile.jpeg
Boost Mobile
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boost Mobile
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Telcel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boost Mobile in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telcel in 2025.

Incident History — Boost Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boost Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Telcel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telcel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boost-mobile.jpeg
Boost Mobile
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised Windows domain controllers
Motivation: Ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Telcel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boost Mobile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boost Mobile company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Telcel company has not reported any.

In the current year, Telcel company and Boost Mobile company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Boost Mobile company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Telcel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Boost Mobile company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Telcel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Telcel company nor Boost Mobile company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boost Mobile company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boost Mobile company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Telcel company.

Telcel company employs more people globally than Boost Mobile company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boost Mobile nor Telcel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N