Comparison Overview

Bonsai Fine Arts

VS

Sulgrave Manor

Bonsai Fine Arts

509 McCormick Drive, Glen Burnie, MD, 21061, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Bonsai Fine Arts is a company composed of experienced art handlers, designers and master packers. This group of art service professionals came together to provide the great museums, galleries and private collectors with all their trucking, transportation, crating, and storage needs. We have offices in Maryland, New York and Atlanta, with in house shuttle service covering the entire Eastern Seaboard and the MidWestern States, Exclusive and Expedited Art trucking service to the lower 48, and collaborative network service throught the country.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sulgrave Manor

Manor Road, Banbury, OX15 4BY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Welcome to Sulgrave Manor & Garden. Built by the ancestors of George Washington and saved from ruin by donors from both the UK and USA, Sulgrave Manor is the original home of the Special Relationship. Steeped in history with a legacy that unites nations, be inspired by our stories and consider why working together is still important today.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonsai-fine-arts.jpeg
Bonsai Fine Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulgrave-manor.jpeg
Sulgrave Manor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bonsai Fine Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sulgrave Manor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bonsai Fine Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sulgrave Manor in 2025.

Incident History — Bonsai Fine Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bonsai Fine Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sulgrave Manor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sulgrave Manor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonsai-fine-arts.jpeg
Bonsai Fine Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sulgrave-manor.jpeg
Sulgrave Manor
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bonsai Fine Arts company and Sulgrave Manor company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sulgrave Manor company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bonsai Fine Arts company.

In the current year, Sulgrave Manor company and Bonsai Fine Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor Bonsai Fine Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor Bonsai Fine Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sulgrave Manor company nor Bonsai Fine Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts company nor Sulgrave Manor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts company nor Sulgrave Manor company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bonsai Fine Arts company employs more people globally than Sulgrave Manor company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bonsai Fine Arts nor Sulgrave Manor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X