Comparison Overview

Bonpet Brasil

VS

Glatte Incorporated

Bonpet Brasil

Rua Olimpíadas 205, São Paulo, undefined, 04551-000, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Em 1953 na cidade de Tóquio, Djiro Niizama, professor cientista em química, após 15 anos de pesquisa, sintetizou um líquido orgânico (água leve), que possui propriedades únicas na extinção do incêndio e batizou com o nome BONPET. O Líquido Bonpet é uma solução química aquosa de sais inorgânicos e compostos orgânicos. Se decompõem em gases (CO2 e N2), provocando o abafamento, o resfriamento e o isolamento do foco inicial do incêndio e uma formação de um filme que não permite a reignição. No Brasil a empresa Bonpet Brasil é uma marca registrada da Mattos & Grimaldi Rio Comércio e Representações.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Glatte Incorporated

7150 Hart St, Mentor, Ohio, 44060, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Glatte Incorporated is a leading Manufacturer's Representative of industrial process equipment. We have a reputation for providing intensive sales and marketing coverage for our principals and a high level of technical application engineering assistance for our customer base. Dedication to complete customer satisfaction is the defining character of Glatte Incorporated. Our principals have been carefully selected to provide leading edge, world class products. Each of them has demonstrated performance and leadership in their special field. We serve clients in the following states: Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Please visit our website to view all of our product offerings.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonpet.jpeg
Bonpet Brasil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glatte-incorporated.jpeg
Glatte Incorporated
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bonpet Brasil
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glatte Incorporated
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bonpet Brasil in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glatte Incorporated in 2025.

Incident History — Bonpet Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bonpet Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glatte Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glatte Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonpet.jpeg
Bonpet Brasil
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glatte-incorporated.jpeg
Glatte Incorporated
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glatte Incorporated company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bonpet Brasil company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glatte Incorporated company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bonpet Brasil company.

In the current year, Glatte Incorporated company and Bonpet Brasil company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glatte Incorporated company nor Bonpet Brasil company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glatte Incorporated company nor Bonpet Brasil company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glatte Incorporated company nor Bonpet Brasil company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bonpet Brasil company nor Glatte Incorporated company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bonpet Brasil company nor Glatte Incorporated company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bonpet Brasil company employs more people globally than Glatte Incorporated company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bonpet Brasil nor Glatte Incorporated holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H