Comparison Overview

Bonfire Effect

VS

Deloitte

Bonfire Effect

221 Jefferson St, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.bonfireeffect.com

Strong

Sometimes your organization needs a spark. That's where the “Bonfire Effect” comes in. We're a B2B agency that injects a dose of creativity into every project. Think bold branding campaigns, change management with a fresh twist, and professional services that don't put you to sleep. Our team? Masters of their craft who've built epic partnerships with companies across the US. We know your challenges are complex, and we're here to craft innovative solutions that get results. Ready to ignite the future of your business? Let's chat! bonfireeffect.com

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Deloitte

Worldwide, None, Worldwide, None, OO, None
Last Update: 2025-09-16 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.deloitte.com/

Deloitte drives progress. Our firms around the world help clients become leaders wherever they choose to compete. Deloitte invests in outstanding people of diverse talents and backgrounds and empowers them to achieve more than they could elsewhere. Our work combines advice with action and integrity. We believe that when our clients and society are stronger, so are we. Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more. The content on this page contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively the “Deloitte Network”) is, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on content from this page.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 493,499
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonfireeffect.jpeg
Bonfire Effect
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deloitte.jpeg
Deloitte
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bonfire Effect
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deloitte
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bonfire Effect in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

Deloitte has 127.27% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Bonfire Effect (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bonfire Effect cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deloitte (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deloitte cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bonfireeffect.jpeg
Bonfire Effect
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deloitte.jpeg
Deloitte
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Theft, Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Bonfire Effect company and Deloitte company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Deloitte company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bonfire Effect company has not reported any.

In the current year, Deloitte company has reported more cyber incidents than Bonfire Effect company.

Neither Deloitte company nor Bonfire Effect company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Deloitte company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Bonfire Effect company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Deloitte company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bonfire Effect company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bonfire Effect company nor Deloitte company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Deloitte company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bonfire Effect company.

Deloitte company employs more people globally than Bonfire Effect company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. The affected element is the function elf_swap_shdr in the library bfd/elfcode.h of the component Linker. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Impacted is the function _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component Linker. Executing manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in GNU Binutils 2.45. This issue affects the function dump_dwarf_section of the file binutils/objdump.c. Performing manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.7
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education up to 1.0.4. This vulnerability affects the function selectStudentExamInfoList of the file src/main/java/com/education/api/controller/student/ExamInfoController.java. Such manipulation of the argument subjectId leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-09-27
Updated
Date
2025-09-27
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References