Comparison Overview

Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation

VS

Rutters Solicitors

Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation

10 Whitechapel High Street, Aldgate, E1 8QS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Bond Solon provides training, support and guidance on a global basis for anyone who is facing the prospect of being cross-examined or questioned in any type of legal forum, regulatory hearing, meeting or interview. Giving evidence can be a daunting experience and should a witness not perform well, then the consequences can be far reaching. The risks to your case can be minimised if witnesses undertake Witness Familiarisation with Bond Solon.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rutters Solicitors

2 Bimport, SHAFTESBURY, GB, SP7 8AY
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Rutters has been established for longer than any other firm in North Dorset with offices in Shaftesbury and Gillingham, Dorset, providing legal services to both our individual and business clients. We pride ourselves on our personal approach and the majority of our business stems from recommendations. We offer strong support and advice along with our ability to focus on solutions, not problems. We opened in 1837. Our longevity shows that our clients value our approach and expertise.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bond-solon-witness-familiarisation.jpeg
Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutters.jpeg
Rutters Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rutters Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rutters Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rutters Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutters Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bond-solon-witness-familiarisation.jpeg
Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutters.jpeg
Rutters Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company and Rutters Solicitors company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rutters Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company.

In the current year, Rutters Solicitors company and Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rutters Solicitors company nor Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rutters Solicitors company nor Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rutters Solicitors company nor Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company nor Rutters Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rutters Solicitors company.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bond Solon Witness Familiarisation nor Rutters Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X