Comparison Overview

Bollin Label

VS

Clark's Litho

Bollin Label

6001 Brent Drive, Toledo, Ohio, 43611, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Bollin Label prints and designs high-impact custom and stock labels along with merchandising solutions for a variety of products and markets. Our manufacturing process begins with a creative team of in-house artists whose designs are converted to digital plates for high-speed, sophisticated flexographic printing — all of which serve to produce top-quality labels for any product in any environment.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clark's Litho

14700 Avion Pkwy, Chantilly, Virginia, 20151, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Clark’s Litho is a leading provider of commercial print and fulfillment services in the Washington, DC market place and beyond. Ranked in the top 15 “Commercial Printers” list by the Washington Business Journal for the last several years, our success has been established through the professionalism and dedication of our employees to offering the utmost in product quality and responsiveness to client needs. Clark’s Litho provides traditional offset printing, digital printing and variable data, die cutting, fulfillment, mailing, distribution and storage of client materials. Clear, concise communication and attention to detail allow us to produce your projects on time and within budget. We simply need the opportunity to discuss a project, provide a quote, or assist in planning or estimating for budgeting purposes, and you will quickly realize the benefits of working with our team! Clark’s Litho . . . a print and fulfillment partner you can trust to capture the details, focus on the process, and provide results that consistently enhance the effectiveness of your corporate messaging. Clark's Litho Headquarters: 14700 Avion Pkwy Suite 300 Chantilly, VA 20151

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bollin-label-systems.jpeg
Bollin Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clark's-litho.jpeg
Clark's Litho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bollin Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clark's Litho
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bollin Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clark's Litho in 2025.

Incident History — Bollin Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bollin Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clark's Litho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark's Litho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bollin-label-systems.jpeg
Bollin Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clark's-litho.jpeg
Clark's Litho
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bollin Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clark's Litho company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clark's Litho company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bollin Label company.

In the current year, Clark's Litho company and Bollin Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clark's Litho company nor Bollin Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clark's Litho company nor Bollin Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clark's Litho company nor Bollin Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bollin Label company nor Clark's Litho company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bollin Label company nor Clark's Litho company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bollin Label company employs more people globally than Clark's Litho company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bollin Label nor Clark's Litho holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N