Comparison Overview

Boleman Law Firm

VS

MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers

Boleman Law Firm

2104 W. Laburnum Ave., Suite 201, Richmond, VA, 23227, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Boleman Law Firm is the largest consumer bankruptcy law firm in the Commonwealth of Virginia, providing legal solutions for financial problems. Over 106,000 clients served over the past 24 years. 17 experienced, skilled lawyers. Offices in Richmond, Newport News, and Virginia Beach, Virginia. Practice is limited to Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 consumer bankruptcy. Members or participants of the American Bankruptcy Institute, National Association of Chapter 13 Trustees, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges, Virginia State Bar Bankruptcy Section, Tidewater Bankruptcy Bar Association, Bankruptcy Section of the Richmond Bar Association.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers

2941 Sunrise Blvd, Rancho Cordova, California, 95742, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

MDexperts, a division of MDstaffers, provides personalized service to attorneys in all aspects of medical litigation. We have board-certified physicians in every specialty and subspecialty who can evaluate the merit of medical cases, write comprehensive medical opinions, and provide expert testimony. We also provide physician’s counsel to clients to prepare for depositions, mediation, and trial cross-examination strategy. Our in-house physician expert is available to provide a free ten minute consultation at your convenience.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boleman-law-firm-pc.jpeg
Boleman Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mdexperts.jpeg
MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boleman Law Firm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boleman Law Firm in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers in 2025.

Incident History — Boleman Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boleman Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boleman-law-firm-pc.jpeg
Boleman Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mdexperts.jpeg
MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Boleman Law Firm company and MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boleman Law Firm company.

In the current year, MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company and Boleman Law Firm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company nor Boleman Law Firm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company nor Boleman Law Firm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company nor Boleman Law Firm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boleman Law Firm company nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boleman Law Firm company.

Boleman Law Firm company employs more people globally than MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boleman Law Firm nor MDexperts, a service of MDstaffers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X