Comparison Overview

Bold Duck Studio

VS

Kenyon Disend, PLLC

Bold Duck Studio

PO Box 54715, Cincinnati, OH, US, 45254
Last Update: 2025-11-28

A BATTLE-TESTED BUSINESS DESIGN STUDIO THAT HAS A COMBINED 40 YEARS HELPING BIGLAW STREAMLINE PROCESSES, ENHANCE CLIENT SERVICE, GENERATE MORE VALUE, AND PLAY TO WIN. WE’RE INTRAPRENEURS, WHICH MEANS WE ARE DOERS WITHIN YOUR ORANIZATION WHO PROMOTE AND EXECUTE INNOVATIVE AND HIGHLY-PRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT. THE KEY WORD THERE IS “WITHIN”. ANY CLIENT WE WORK WITH IS MORE THAN JUST A CLIENT TO US. OUR CLIENTS ARE OUR COMPANY, WHICH MEANS WE DON’T WIN UNLESS YOU WIN. AND, WE HAVE A TRACK RECORD TO PROVE THIS. WE’VE DESIGNED AND BUILT OUT INNOVATIVE AND STREAMLINED SERVICE MODELS THAT HAVE GENERATED MILLIONS IN ANNUAL REVENUE AND IN COST SAVINGS FOR MANY BIGLAW ENTITIES. THIS IS NO EXAGGERATION, WE HAVE THE PROOF.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kenyon Disend, PLLC

11 Front Street South, Issaquah, Washington, 98027, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Kenyon Disend PLLC - The Municipal Law Firm - was founded in 1993 solely to provide first-class legal services to Washington cities. Over the years, we have remained dedicated to our three core principles - provide the highest quality legal services to Washington cities and other public agencies, in a timely and comprehensive manner, at an exceptional value. We daily address the full range of municipal matters, from day-to-day legal work to focused practice areas including land use, Public Records Act and Open Public Meetings Act issues, litigation and appellate advocacy on a variety of municipal issues, labor and employment law, public works bidding and construction, state taxation, and multiple forms of franchise agreements. Legal problems can be complicated. The way we talk isn’t. Located in historic downtown Issaquah, Kenyon Disend earns a small-town fee while providing big city service. We do not sue cities. And we do not represent developers or others with positions adverse to Washington cities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bold-duck-studio.jpeg
Bold Duck Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenyon-disend-pllc.jpeg
Kenyon Disend, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bold Duck Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kenyon Disend, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bold Duck Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenyon Disend, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Bold Duck Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bold Duck Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kenyon Disend, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenyon Disend, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bold-duck-studio.jpeg
Bold Duck Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenyon-disend-pllc.jpeg
Kenyon Disend, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kenyon Disend, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bold Duck Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kenyon Disend, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bold Duck Studio company.

In the current year, Kenyon Disend, PLLC company and Bold Duck Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kenyon Disend, PLLC company nor Bold Duck Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kenyon Disend, PLLC company nor Bold Duck Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kenyon Disend, PLLC company nor Bold Duck Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bold Duck Studio company nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bold Duck Studio company nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kenyon Disend, PLLC company employs more people globally than Bold Duck Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bold Duck Studio nor Kenyon Disend, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X