Comparison Overview

Bok Tower Gardens

VS

South Australian Museum

Bok Tower Gardens

1151 Tower Blvd, Lake Wales, 33853, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://boktowergardens.org

Bok Tower Gardens is a National Historic Landmark, contemplative garden, and bird sanctuary located north of Lake Wales, Florida, United States. It consists of a 250-acre (100 ha) garden, the 205-foot (62 m) tall Singing Tower with its carillon bells, Pine Ridge Trail, Pinewood Estate, and a visitor center. The tower is built upon Iron Mountain, one of the highest points of peninsular Florida, estimated to be 295 feet (90 m) above sea level.[4] It is a National Historic Landmark that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The gardens are designed by renowned landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. The focal point of the Gardens is the neogothic and art deco Singing Tower, designed Milton B. Medary and featuring work by Lee Lawrie, Samuel Yellin, and J.H. Dulles Allen. The Tower houses a 60 bell carillon, on which concerts are performed daily.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

South Australian Museum

South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.samuseum.sa.gov.au

The South Australian Museum is recognised as a global leader in Australian Aboriginal heritage and scientific research, based on its research and premier collections. The Museum is also one of the most highly visited cultural institutions in the country. The South Australian Museum is a division of Arts SA within the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC). The role of the museum, as prescribed under the South Australian Museum Act, 1976-1985 is: to increase knowledge and understanding of our natural and cultural heritage: to serve the community by acquiring, preserving, interpreting and presenting to the public, material evidence concerning people and nature; and to provide opportunities for study, education and enjoyment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bok-tower-gardens.jpeg
Bok Tower Gardens
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-australian-museum.jpeg
South Australian Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bok Tower Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Australian Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bok Tower Gardens in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Australian Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Bok Tower Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bok Tower Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Australian Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Australian Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bok-tower-gardens.jpeg
Bok Tower Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-australian-museum.jpeg
South Australian Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bok Tower Gardens company and South Australian Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, South Australian Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bok Tower Gardens company.

In the current year, South Australian Museum company and Bok Tower Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Bok Tower Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Bok Tower Gardens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Bok Tower Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens company nor South Australian Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens company nor South Australian Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South Australian Museum company employs more people globally than Bok Tower Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bok Tower Gardens nor South Australian Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References