Comparison Overview

Bodega Magazine

VS

IntechOpen

Bodega Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Bodega Magazine releases digital issues on the first Monday of every month, featuring poetry, prose, and occasional interviews by established and emerging writers. Past contributors have included Lydia Davis, Colum McCann, Anne Carson, Emma Straub, Matthew Rohrer, Emily Rapp, Francisco Goldman, and Chuck Wachtel, and more. We’re here to give you a handful of essential pieces you can digest in one sitting. We are always on the hunt for great new writing. For more information check out www.bodegamag.com. Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/bodegamag Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/bodegamag

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IntechOpen

Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2004, IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books - Built by scientists, for scientists provides a collaborative environment for peer-reviewed scientific content and book publishing of academic research, giving scientific thinking its home. The scientific community of editors, authors, funders and librarians worldwide benefit from Open Access research dissemination, ensuring faster spreading and advancement of scientific knowledge. The company’s global headquarter is in London, UK.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bodega-magazine.jpeg
Bodega Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intechopen.jpeg
IntechOpen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bodega Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IntechOpen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bodega Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IntechOpen in 2025.

Incident History — Bodega Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bodega Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IntechOpen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IntechOpen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bodega-magazine.jpeg
Bodega Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intechopen.jpeg
IntechOpen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IntechOpen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bodega Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IntechOpen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bodega Magazine company.

In the current year, IntechOpen company and Bodega Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IntechOpen company nor Bodega Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IntechOpen company nor Bodega Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IntechOpen company nor Bodega Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bodega Magazine company nor IntechOpen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bodega Magazine company nor IntechOpen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IntechOpen company employs more people globally than Bodega Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bodega Magazine nor IntechOpen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.