Comparison Overview

Boca Raton Museum of Art

VS

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum

Boca Raton Museum of Art

501 Plaza Real, Boca Raton, FL, 33432, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Boca Museum of Art envisions itself as the inclusive, dynamic, and engaging cultural and educational nexus for the community that values art for its incomparable expression, documentation, and reflection of human aspiration and achievement. As "The Official Fine Arts Museum for the City of Boca Raton."​ the Museum plays a key role in enhancing the cultural, educational, and economic vitality of Boca Raton and its surrounding communities, and has maintained the reputation of being one of South Florida's leading cultural institutions, attracting more than 200,000 visitors annually to its galleries and programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum

10975 SW 17th St., Miami, FL, 33199, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1977, The Art Museum at Florida International University (MMC/FIU) started as a student gallery. Since then, it has grown to achieve official recognition as a major cultural institution of the State of Florida for its unprecedented collection of Latin American and 20th century American art, its innovative exhibitions that draw on or enhance the collection, and its unparalleled service to South Florida's diverse audiences. In 2003, the Art Museum at FIU was officially renamed The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum. In 1999, The Museum received accreditation from the American Association of Museums (AAM). It has assumed a central role in the FIU community and in the cultural life of South Florida as a whole through its mission to serve the broadest audience possible and to deliver all programs and services free of charge. The Frost Art Museum is also an affiliate within the Smithsonian Affiliations program.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boca-raton-museum-of-art.jpeg
Boca Raton Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-patricia-&-phillip-frost-art-museum.jpeg
The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boca Raton Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boca Raton Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Boca Raton Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boca Raton Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boca-raton-museum-of-art.jpeg
Boca Raton Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-patricia-&-phillip-frost-art-museum.jpeg
The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boca Raton Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boca Raton Museum of Art company.

In the current year, The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company and Boca Raton Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company nor Boca Raton Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company nor Boca Raton Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company nor Boca Raton Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art company nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art company nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Boca Raton Museum of Art company employs more people globally than The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boca Raton Museum of Art nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H