Comparison Overview

BoardPrep Recovery Center

VS

Pacific Grove Hospital

BoardPrep Recovery Center

2522 West Kennedy Blvd, Tampa, Florida, 33609, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Welcome to BoardPrep Recovery Center, the affordable and effective addiction and mental health treatment center in South Tampa. We specialize in innovative behavioral health treatments, including complex dual disorders. Based on the successful physician health recovery model, BoardPrep Recovery improves long-term results through enhanced structure, coaching, and ongoing recovery monitoring. Founders John and Liz Harden developed the BoardPrep treatment method through more than thirty years of clinical experience with dual-diagnosis patients. BoardPrep’s evidence-based approach improves patient follow-through and long-term outcomes. Treatment plans are customized to address the complex interplay of personal and environmental challenges, creating an optimal recovery experience. Begin the assessment and intake process today. Your loved one could be safe in treatment right away or within 24 hours. We are licensed and experienced clinicians. We will help you understand all your options and make the best decision for recovery. BoardPrep Recovery is committed to safety-first and effective results. Call 813-600-7929 now. A licensed clinician is available to talk, even on weekends and evenings.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pacific Grove Hospital

5900 Brockton Ave, Riverside, 92506, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Pacific Grove Hospital is a 68-bed, acute psychiatric and chemical dependency hospital situated on 4.5 acres in the heart of Riverside, Calif. Our highly trained staff treats voluntary patients through the following programs: •Acute Psychiatric: Full-service care for adults suffering from mental health disorders such as anxiety and depression, bipolar disorders, disrupted sleep patterns, impulse behavior disorders, grief and loss management, personality disorders and general management of life’s stressors •Geriatric Psychiatric: Our Older Adult Unit provides specialized treatment for individuals age 65 and older who are struggling with depression or confusion, addiction to alcohol or medication, agitation or anxiety, and conditions associated with dementia. •Chemical Dependency Treatment: Comprehensive addiction treatment to help individuals overcome dependence on alcohol, prescription pain medications, nicotine or controlled substances such as amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine and opiates — including medically managed detoxification, psychological and psychiatric evaluations, rehabilitation, counseling, and 12-step recovery and continuing care programs •Outpatient Programs: Partial hospitalization and intensive outpatient programs meet every week, Monday through Friday, offering program tracks for psychiatric care, chemical dependency treatment and dual treatment for mental health and addiction. We also anticipate positive changes as we begin considering renovations and upgrades to Pacific Grove, and evaluate ways we may further develop and expand our services. I look forward to sharing more information with you in the months ahead.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boardprep-llc.jpeg
BoardPrep Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-grove-hospital.jpeg
Pacific Grove Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BoardPrep Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Grove Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BoardPrep Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Grove Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — BoardPrep Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BoardPrep Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Grove Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Grove Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boardprep-llc.jpeg
BoardPrep Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-grove-hospital.jpeg
Pacific Grove Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pacific Grove Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BoardPrep Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pacific Grove Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BoardPrep Recovery Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Pacific Grove Hospital company and BoardPrep Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Grove Hospital company nor BoardPrep Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Pacific Grove Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BoardPrep Recovery Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pacific Grove Hospital company nor BoardPrep Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center company nor Pacific Grove Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pacific Grove Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BoardPrep Recovery Center company.

Pacific Grove Hospital company employs more people globally than BoardPrep Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BoardPrep Recovery Center nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N