Comparison Overview

BNP Paribas Fortis

VS

Sberbank

BNP Paribas Fortis

Rue Montagne du Parc 3, Brussels, 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bnpparibasfortis.be

For over 200 years, BNP Paribas Fortis has helped drive the growth and prosperity of Belgium’s economy and communities. The mission of our 12,000 colleagues is clear: be the trusted financial partner for four million individual customers, businesses and organisations. We do this by offering advice and solutions via the channels they prefer: digitally, by phone, via video call or in a bank or post office branch.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 12,043
Subsidiaries: 77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Sberbank

RU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
https://sber.ru

Сбер — крупнейший банк в России, поставщик надёжных технологических решений и один из ведущих финансовых институтов страны. Мы не боимся меняться и открывать новые горизонты, но в то же время остаёмся верными принципам, сформированным за нашу 180-летнюю историю. Такой подход позволяет нам создавать и развивать десятки технологичных направлений. Нашими сервисами пользуются миллионы людей, а над их созданием и совершенствованием работают десятки тысяч сотрудников. Sber is the largest bank in Russia, supplier of reliable technological solutions and one of the leading national financial institutions. We are not afraid to change and open up new horizons, but at the same time we remain true to the principles that have been formed over our 180-year history. This approach allows us to create and develop dozens of technological areas. Our services are used by millions of people, and thousands of employees are working on their creation and improvement.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,459
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bnpparibasfortis.jpeg
BNP Paribas Fortis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BNP Paribas Fortis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sberbank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Fortis in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sberbank in 2025.

Incident History — BNP Paribas Fortis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas Fortis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sberbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sberbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bnpparibasfortis.jpeg
BNP Paribas Fortis
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical ATM Skimming Device
Motivation: Financial Gain (Likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Skimming
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sberbank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BNP Paribas Fortis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BNP Paribas Fortis company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sberbank company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sberbank company and BNP Paribas Fortis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sberbank company nor BNP Paribas Fortis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BNP Paribas Fortis company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Sberbank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sberbank company nor BNP Paribas Fortis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis company nor Sberbank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BNP Paribas Fortis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sberbank company.

BNP Paribas Fortis company employs more people globally than Sberbank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor Sberbank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References