Comparison Overview

BNP Paribas Fortis

VS

CaixaBank

BNP Paribas Fortis

Rue Montagne du Parc 3, Brussels, 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bnpparibasfortis.be

For over 200 years, BNP Paribas Fortis has helped drive the growth and prosperity of Belgium’s economy and communities. The mission of our 12,000 colleagues is clear: be the trusted financial partner for four million individual customers, businesses and organisations. We do this by offering advice and solutions via the channels they prefer: digitally, by phone, via video call or in a bank or post office branch.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 12,043
Subsidiaries: 77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1
View Profile

CaixaBank

Pintor Sorolla, 2-4, Valencia , undefined, 46002, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
https://www.caixabank.es

We are the leading financial group in the Spanish market, comprised of banking business, insurance activity and investments in international banks and leading companies in the services sector. CaixaBank is a financial group with a socially responsible, long-term universal banking model, based on quality, trust, and specialisation, which offers a value proposition of products and services adapted for each sector, adopting innovation as a strategic challenge and a distinguishing feature of its corporate culture, and whose leading position in retail banking in Spain and Portugal makes it a key player in supporting sustainable economic growth.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 20,355
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bnpparibasfortis.jpeg
BNP Paribas Fortis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caixabank.jpeg
CaixaBank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BNP Paribas Fortis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CaixaBank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas Fortis in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CaixaBank in 2025.

Incident History — BNP Paribas Fortis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNP Paribas Fortis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CaixaBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CaixaBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bnpparibasfortis.jpeg
BNP Paribas Fortis
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical ATM Skimming Device
Motivation: Financial Gain (Likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Skimming
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caixabank.jpeg
CaixaBank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CaixaBank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BNP Paribas Fortis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BNP Paribas Fortis company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CaixaBank company has not reported any.

In the current year, CaixaBank company and BNP Paribas Fortis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CaixaBank company nor BNP Paribas Fortis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BNP Paribas Fortis company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other CaixaBank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CaixaBank company nor BNP Paribas Fortis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis company nor CaixaBank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BNP Paribas Fortis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CaixaBank company.

CaixaBank company employs more people globally than BNP Paribas Fortis company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BNP Paribas Fortis nor CaixaBank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References